OK i will give it to you, that post sounded very clever, but seriously where is the proof dude. i need cold hard facts i dont go on one guys opinion. I am a man of science and until i see some proof infront of me i still stand by the fact girls like pink.Rman Virgil wrote:Actually that would be you as you obviously have no understanding of fundamental scientific methodology or the limited value of statistical sampling or any of the aggregate scientific disciplines that speak to this question directly.Wisler wrote:Show me some scientific evidence saying im wrong or you are all just talking out your asses.
You are also a good example of the maxim that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.... or, at the very least, as annoying as bed bug bites.
The evidence against your position is monumental & staggering but you would need to do some serous work of educating yourself starting at ground zero with Francis Bacon's delineation of the Scientific Method some 400 years ago. But that is not likely to happen as your are clearly an intellectual lightweight & proud of it - who also mistakes crass snark for incisive wit and pressing a hot link or two for exhaustive scientific rigor.
The subject is interesting however your presentation is anything but.
My initial post today was simply a jazzy intellectual riff of comedic wit which you chose to take down a sobering road which I mistakenly followed - mistakenly, I affirm, for all the reasons already covered.
I'll not make that mistake again or compound this one by fomenting any more debate with an obdurate boob.
.
All you are giving me is long long posts that for some reason i read, i think they said something about pigeons? but seriously show me the proof or i will consider you wrong.
You have 3 options.
1:go on google and look for proof to prove me wrong.
2:conduct an experiment your self to prove me wrong.
3:keep talking like a smartass who has no evidence to back him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVa060VgL0s 1:19-1:22.
