Lateral Weapons
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Lateral Weapons
This is not what he was propposing. :-S
~Olrox
-
charonme
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:28
Re: Lateral Weapons
Doesn't the multiturret body meet his demand?warzonero wrote:put more than 1 diferent weapon at 1 tank
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Lateral Weapons
Why would he suggest "lateral weapons" if it did?charonme wrote:Doesn't the multiturret body meet his demand?warzonero wrote:put more than 1 diferent weapon at 1 tank
~Olrox
-
DuKe2112
- Trained

- Posts: 44
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 22:01
Re: Lateral Weapons
Well the dragon is the very last body and in campaign it doesn't show up at all.
For example in earth 2150 (Lunar Corp) the second body you get is a multi, but they also had a size system, so that you couldn't put two heavy cannons until you get a heavier body.
ALso any sort of lateral/secondary weapons could do to arm the support units. I hate it when a repair unit retreats and stumbles on a lone scavenger...
Besides, depending on how they are attached some lateral weapons actually can shoot forward, only not the opposite side.
For example in earth 2150 (Lunar Corp) the second body you get is a multi, but they also had a size system, so that you couldn't put two heavy cannons until you get a heavier body.
ALso any sort of lateral/secondary weapons could do to arm the support units. I hate it when a repair unit retreats and stumbles on a lone scavenger...
Besides, depending on how they are attached some lateral weapons actually can shoot forward, only not the opposite side.
-
charonme
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:28
Re: Lateral Weapons
because of his poor or even nonexistent english xDOlrox wrote:Why would he suggest "lateral weapons" if it did?
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Lateral Weapons
Nope. Language proficiency won't make anybody dumber or smarter, he wouldn't lack knowledge about the multi-turret capability of dragon just because he doesn't supposedly know how to properly write english.charonme wrote:because of his poor or even nonexistent english xDOlrox wrote:Why would he suggest "lateral weapons" if it did?
But this idea won't go further as a official feature, because a more wide-meaning one was already rejected as such. Or at least I think so.
~Olrox
-
DuKe2112
- Trained

- Posts: 44
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 22:01
Re: Lateral Weapons
ww1 british mark series tanks.

-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Lateral Weapons
ww1 tank designs for Warzone 2100? Why?DuKe2112 wrote:ww1 british mark series tanks.
<image>
Secondary turrets make much more sense.
~Olrox
-
DuKe2112
- Trained

- Posts: 44
- Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 22:01
Re: Lateral Weapons
Actually I answered to a post that wanted am example. That was the first (and only) I found.
That post is now gone.
That post is now gone.
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Lateral Weapons
That I saw the post asking for an example. I wonder what happenned to itDuKe2112 wrote:Actually I answered to a post that wanted am example. That was the first (and only) I found.
~Olrox
-
pmarc
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 26 Mar 2010, 18:45
Re: Lateral Weapons
because it is a ww2 idea?Olrox wrote: ww1 tank designs for Warzone 2100? Why?
Secondary turrets make much more sense.
Landkreuze anyone?

-
MetalWarrior95
- Trained

- Posts: 332
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 01:26
- Location: Trnje Neighbourhood, Zagreb, Croatia
Re: Lateral Weapons
Lol,that huge tnk would survive anything,it would be too slow...Russian T-34 head with 110mm and two futuristic heads from some tank with 200 mm cannons??Unrealistic and too expensive!
Il crush you!If i get crushed,il crush you twice stronger!!If you crush me again,then il blow up your PC!!