Cyclone/Whirlwind

Discuss the future of Warzone 2100 with us.
3drts
Trained
Trained
Posts: 379
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 03:50

Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by 3drts »

Why doesn't whirldwind obsolete Cyclone now?
They have the same cost: $150
They both have splash radius of 0.5
Whirlwind has higher ROF and higher damage (direct and splash).
It is simply better than cyclone in every catagory, for the same cost?

I think cyclone and whirlwind should be differentiated: one is supposedly quad 80mm (cyclone), one is supposedly quad 30mm (though it looks like twin 4-barrel gatling guns).
So why not give Cyclone a higher damage(direct hit, and splash) than Whirlwind, but a lower ROF, and increase its splash radius to 1.0 instead of 0.5?
As it is now, WW should replace cyclone, not hurricane: Hurricane may be worse, but at least it is cheaper.
Cyclone currently is just a weaker version of WW, at the same price, there is no possible reason you would want to use it over WW.
User avatar
Olrox
Art contributor
Posts: 1999
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Olrox »

3drts wrote: I think cyclone and whirlwind should be differentiated: one is supposedly quad 80mm (cyclone), one is supposedly quad 30mm (though it looks like twin 4-barrel gatling guns).
Twin quad-barreled 30mm rotary guns, I think.
3drts wrote: So why not give Cyclone a higher damage(direct hit, and splash) than Whirlwind, but a lower ROF, and increase its splash radius to 1.0 instead of 0.5?
I Agree, there should be a similar relation than Howitzer>Ground Shaker>Hellstorm, or Whirlwind should make Cyclone obsolete.

Given the values you brought forth, obviously. If those aren't accurate, I can't guarantee my opinion :cool:

~Olrox
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Zarel »

New Cyclone:
  • Damage: 100s (splash: 100, 2 tiles)
    ROF: 60

    Prereqs: AA HE Flak Mk1, Hyper Velocity Cannon
New Whirlwind:
  • Prereqs: AA HE Flak Mk2, Assault Gun
Gives people even more of a reason to use cannons. :)

yes/no?
User avatar
Saberuneko
Regular
Regular
Posts: 558
Joined: 15 Jan 2010, 18:20

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Saberuneko »

True.
User avatar
Olrox
Art contributor
Posts: 1999
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Olrox »

Zarel wrote:New Cyclone:
  • Damage: 100s (splash: 100, 2 tiles)
    ROF: 60

    Prereqs: AA HE Flak Mk1, Hyper Velocity Cannon
New Whirlwind:
  • Prereqs: AA HE Flak Mk2, Assault Gun
Gives people even more of a reason to use cannons. :)

yes/no?
Yeah, I think it's worth trying. That also makes for some group-fighting VTOL AA gun idea (Anti-aircraft artillery was the name, I guess)

~Olrox
PkK
Trained
Trained
Posts: 81
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 21:22

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by PkK »

Zarel wrote:New Cyclone:
  • Damage: 100s (splash: 100, 2 tiles)
    ROF: 60

    Prereqs: AA HE Flak Mk1, Hyper Velocity Cannon
New Whirlwind:
  • Prereqs: AA HE Flak Mk2, Assault Gun
Gives people even more of a reason to use cannons. :)

yes/no?
I'm not sure about Hyper Velocity Cannon as a prerequesite. While wz2100 lives in the future we might want to look at the past: In WWII anti-air gun muzzle velocities seem to be comparable to tank muzzle velocities.

I agree that we need a stronger AA weapon in the cannon path (in air defense power you're even further behind the missile path than in artillery range).

I think the Re-tooling Air defense thread viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3182 has balanced and well-though out proposals about anti-air rebalancing that should be considered and discussed before making the change, too.

Philipp
PkK
Trained
Trained
Posts: 81
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 21:22

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by PkK »

Zarel wrote:New Cyclone:
  • Damage: 100s (splash: 100, 2 tiles)
    ROF: 60

    Prereqs: AA HE Flak Mk1, Hyper Velocity Cannon
New Whirlwind:
  • Prereqs: AA HE Flak Mk2, Assault Gun
Gives people even more of a reason to use cannons. :)

yes/no?
If the Cyclone is the high-damage AAA and Whirlwind is the high rate of fire the prerequesites from within the AA path (ignoring the other ones for now) should be more like:

Cyclone prereq:
AA HE Flak Mk2 (as it is now)

Whirlwind prereq:
AA Ammunition Hopper Mk2 (seems to make more sense to me than requiring a damage upgrade)

Philipp
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Zarel »

PkK wrote:I'm not sure about Hyper Velocity Cannon as a prerequesite. While wz2100 lives in the future we might want to look at the past: In WWII anti-air gun muzzle velocities seem to be comparable to tank muzzle velocities.
It's not about velocity, it's because Hyper Velocity Cannon is the only cannon that can hit air units.
PkK wrote:If the Cyclone is the high-damage AAA and Whirlwind is the high rate of fire the prerequesites from within the AA path (ignoring the other ones for now) should be more like:

Cyclone prereq:
AA HE Flak Mk2 (as it is now)

Whirlwind prereq:
AA Ammunition Hopper Mk2 (seems to make more sense to me than requiring a damage upgrade)
Whirlwind has increased damage over Hurricane, as well as increased ROF.
User avatar
Olrox
Art contributor
Posts: 1999
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Olrox »

Zarel wrote:
PkK wrote:I'm not sure about Hyper Velocity Cannon as a prerequesite. While wz2100 lives in the future we might want to look at the past: In WWII anti-air gun muzzle velocities seem to be comparable to tank muzzle velocities.
It's not about velocity, it's because Hyper Velocity Cannon is the only cannon that can hit air units.
And Hyper velocity cannon is also a regular cannon despite its name (substitutes light and medium cannon, doesn't it?), from the same Tech level as cyclone. If we are going to get fussy about names, it'll be a long path ahead (don't mention railguns please).
Zarel wrote:
PkK wrote:If the Cyclone is the high-damage AAA and Whirlwind is the high rate of fire the prerequesites from within the AA path (ignoring the other ones for now) should be more like:

Cyclone prereq:
AA HE Flak Mk2 (as it is now)

Whirlwind prereq:
AA Ammunition Hopper Mk2 (seems to make more sense to me than requiring a damage upgrade)
Whirlwind has increased damage over Hurricane, as well as increased ROF.
Perhaps making Whirlwind a little bit more expensive would make sense. Just a little bit, like, from 150 do 175 (Since it's overall more powerful).

What do you think?

~Olrox
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Zarel »

Olrox wrote:Perhaps making Whirlwind a little bit more expensive would make sense. Just a little bit, like, from 150 do 175 (Since it's overall more powerful).
Works for me.
3drts
Trained
Trained
Posts: 379
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 03:50

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by 3drts »

PkK wrote: I'm not sure about Hyper Velocity Cannon as a prerequesite. While wz2100 lives in the future we might want to look at the past: In WWII anti-air gun muzzle velocities seem to be comparable to tank muzzle velocities.

I agree that we need a stronger AA weapon in the cannon path (in air defense power you're even further behind the missile path than in artillery range).
Actually, as I was playing through alpha and beta campaign the first time, it felt a lot like WWII (even down to the panther and tiger tank names, lol).

76mm cannons = WW2 allied tank caliber
120mm cannon = modern tank caliber.
88mm HPV = german tank caliber
50 cal machine guns (the M2 machine gun was in use in WWII, still is in use today)
30 cal machine guns.
80mm flak.
105mm howitzers...
Beta campaign had WW2 class weapons.
Only the gatling assault gun and assault cannon dont fit well with WWII

In WWII, they started fielding "hyper velocity cannons", such as the german 88mm tank gun (note, in game, the HPV is 88mm). The upgunned shermans used high velocity cannons, back then, they defined anything over 3,000 fps as hyper velocity.
All tank cannons today are hyper velocity cannons. (M1 Abrams main gun fires a shell at 5,000 fps

http://books.google.com/books?id=HCcDAA ... q=&f=false
Mats
Trained
Trained
Posts: 137
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 16:22
Location: Various

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Mats »

yes/no?
Yes!
making Whirlwind a little bit more expensive would make sense. Just a little bit, like, from 150 do 175
Makes sense.
Full of ideas - Most are probably useless. Feel free to ignore them :)
User avatar
Tenoh
Trained
Trained
Posts: 359
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 15:06

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Tenoh »

Yes,this should be interesting.
"No, you don't want to buy this Sh[beep]t from me. It shoots sideways, it was built by retard zombies in some f[beep]king outreach program." HL:G
Michal
Trained
Trained
Posts: 126
Joined: 10 Jan 2010, 18:07

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by Michal »

I don't really have much idea how 'numbers' effect battle performance, but:
If Cyclone had better splash, it could be used against groups of Vtols, to damage them (and increase rearm time by repair time) and Whirlwind could be a weapon to take Vtols down, one by one.
If it can be done that way, using both Cyclone and Whirlwind could be useful - one would counter the bad sides of the other.
PkK
Trained
Trained
Posts: 81
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 21:22

Re: Cyclone/Whirlwind

Post by PkK »

Zarel wrote:
PkK wrote:If the Cyclone is the high-damage AAA and Whirlwind is the high rate of fire the prerequesites from within the AA path (ignoring the other ones for now) should be more like:

Cyclone prereq:
AA HE Flak Mk2 (as it is now)

Whirlwind prereq:
AA Ammunition Hopper Mk2 (seems to make more sense to me than requiring a damage upgrade)
Whirlwind has increased damage over Hurricane, as well as increased ROF.
Nevertheless the firing speed seems to be the more prominent one.
Maybe more important, requiring an upgrade from a different AA-improvement path (ROF improvements instead of damage improvements) makes the research tree more interesting.

Thus IMO it still would be better to have Whirlwind depend on an ROF upgrade instead of a damage upgrade.

Philipp