Puhdoo's Maps

[Puhdoo]

Here are some maps I created with the FlaME-editor...
enjoy

[Puhdoo]

Schergrat
(160x100)
Arizona-Style 2-Player Map with a Scavanger-Base on the Mountain.
- 4 oils per Player
- 2 oils on the mountain
- 1 oil in each valley

[Puhdoo]

Einschlag
(180x180)
Urban 4-Player map. For 2v2 (horizontal/vertical teams) or all vs all.
Only a few Scavengers on the hills, mainly for 2v2 with vertical teams.
- 2 oils in the center
- 1 oil on each hill
- oil on the riverbanks

[Puhdoo]

Trockental
(200x100)
Arizona 4-Player map. Best for 2v2 with 0/1 and 2/3 as teams.
Some Scavengers in the middle of course.
- 4 oils per base, + 1 a bit outside
- 1 shared oil per team
- 3 oils remaining

[Puhdoo]

Daemmerung
(120x220)
A large 1v1 Arizona-Map, best for long LAN games
Some Scavengers for warmup are already in place.

[NoQ]

Amazing! Natural classic-style asymmetric (yet alsmost-symmetric) terrain is probably last thing i expected from an "oh not another map thread again", yet here we are. I'd probably complain on the oil distribution a bit when i have a chance to play, but it's something easily adjustable.

Excellent work, keep it up!

[Puhdoo]

Schneedamm
(240x180)
4-Player battle in the Rocky Mountains.
For 2v2 I recommend 0/1 and 2/3 as teams, with the mountain between the two teams.
- 7 oils per base, 3 of them a bit outside
- 2 oils a bit above the center, where the Scavenger base is located
- 3 more on the same top-down line
- 1 oil in the center of each half (left/right)

[Giani]

It looks like a very good map.
I will try it.
Btw, what is the size?

[Puhdoo]

I added all map sizes under the title.
After the second game on 'Schneedamm' I also realized that something is missing ...
then I added some trees

Thank you for the feedback, I will probably do another mapping-session in some weeks or months again.

[Staff]

Please pick a license.
viewtopic.php?f=44&t=8094

[NoQ]

Is there a need to explicitly make a license notice in the thread as long as FlaME forces the maker to pick a license and puts it into the addon.lev file comments?

[Puhdoo]

Thats exactly what I expected NoQ

In FlaME I had to specify a licence when compiling the map, I selected GPLv2+ or sth like that, do I really need to explicitly mention this with every new upload?

Regards,
Puhdoo

[Staff]

Thats exactly what I expected NoQ

In FlaME I had to specify a licence when compiling the map, I selected GPLv2+ or sth like that, do I really need to explicitly mention this with every new upload?

Regards,
Puhdoo

The problem is, people have to download to find out what it is, if people bothered to do it at all.

We rather have all information about the license available in thread, for easy reference.

You don't have to do it for each map though, just once is enough unless you change the license for some maps.

[Puhdoo]

got it, have to read those licenses a bit more detailed, maybe I'll update it.
For now it's GPL 2+, in accordance with what I chose in FlaME...

so when I'm going to change this, I would have to recompile in FlaME with the new license and reupload the maps I guess,
can I somehow avoid loosing all those nice download-counts?

Or is it ok to mention it on the top of the site, new Users will see it before downloading, and probably
wont read that addon.lev anyway

[Staff]

Or is it ok to mention it on the top of the site, new Users will see it before downloading, and probably
wont read that addon.lev anyway

Yeah, that is fine.

Usually only distros care about the license stuff, but we are trying to make the job as easy as possible.