Rotate Buildings
-
natbob1
- Trained

- Posts: 37
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 21:49
Rotate Buildings
I noticed that some buildings were rotated when you had the game start with bases. Is it possible to rotate buildings when placing them?
-
psychopompos
- Trained

- Posts: 470
- Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 09:18
- Location: UK
Re: Rotate Buildings
not at the moment.
its been discussed as a feature, but i dont even think a mod has been made to allow it.
its been discussed as a feature, but i dont even think a mod has been made to allow it.
MOTHERBOARD - MSI P7N PLATINUM¦-¦PROCESSOR - C2D E7300 @ 4.00GHZ
MEMORY - 4 Gig (2x2gig) ddr2 1066mhz¦-¦OPERATING SYSTEM - WINDOWS 7 (ULT)
GRAPHICS - BFG GTX 260 OCX (requires ForceWare drivers for good openGL)
MEMORY - 4 Gig (2x2gig) ddr2 1066mhz¦-¦OPERATING SYSTEM - WINDOWS 7 (ULT)
GRAPHICS - BFG GTX 260 OCX (requires ForceWare drivers for good openGL)
-
praefectus
- Trained

- Posts: 36
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 10:52
- Location: Denmark
Re: Rotate Buildings
yes i would be nice to be able to control where the units exit the factory
-
truckspin
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 12 Sep 2009, 14:00
Re: Rotate Buildings
Hello,
in a few cases like on HighGround it is vital to have the position that has factory exits on the right side. On HighGround player 1 has a huge advantage due to that.
(It would be great if someone could balance out HighGround for that. When that problem is solved by allowing different exit directions, the map would have to be changed again, though. A way to balance it would be to make it so that when both players build a factory on their starting position without bases and then produce a truck in there and then drive towards the middle, the two trucks meet exactly at the centre.)
in a few cases like on HighGround it is vital to have the position that has factory exits on the right side. On HighGround player 1 has a huge advantage due to that.
(It would be great if someone could balance out HighGround for that. When that problem is solved by allowing different exit directions, the map would have to be changed again, though. A way to balance it would be to make it so that when both players build a factory on their starting position without bases and then produce a truck in there and then drive towards the middle, the two trucks meet exactly at the centre.)
-
raybritton
- New user
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 27 Oct 2009, 13:21
Re: Rotate Buildings
praefectus you can, if you click the number tile near the factory you can move it around. Units created at factories move to these number tiles and appear on the side of the factory closest to the number tile.
-
zoid
- Trained

- Posts: 125
- Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 00:45
Re: Rotate Buildings
No, they always appear at the bottom.raybritton wrote:praefectus you can, if you click the number tile near the factory you can move it around. Units created at factories move to these number tiles and appear on the side of the factory closest to the number tile.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Rotate Buildings
It's like the first thing I've concluded when I started to change rally points.zoid wrote:No, they always appear at the bottom.raybritton wrote:praefectus you can, if you click the number tile near the factory you can move it around. Units created at factories move to these number tiles and appear on the side of the factory closest to the number tile.
In fact, if you could only select the direction towards which the manufactured unit exits the factory, it would look painfully weird, as the models have doors. This would need to be accompained by structure rotation. I think.
-
Per
- Warzone 2100 Team Member

- Posts: 3780
- Joined: 03 Aug 2006, 19:39
Re: Rotate Buildings
Rotating buildings is no big deal. If you notice, walls are already rotated
How would you make the UI for rotating a building construction order?
-
winsrp
- Trained

- Posts: 417
- Joined: 14 May 2008, 17:00
Re: Rotate Buildings
I wouldn't make any UI, when you are laying a building then right click to rotate, left click to lay down, simple effective, and easy to implement.
-
cybersphinx
- Inactive

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: 01 Sep 2006, 19:17
Re: Rotate Buildings
But we need a new savegame revision for the orientation, don't we?Per wrote:Rotating buildings is no big deal.
Except that right click is used to cancel already.winsrp wrote:I wouldn't make any UI, when you are laying a building then right click to rotate, left click to lay down, simple effective, and easy to implement.
-
winsrp
- Trained

- Posts: 417
- Joined: 14 May 2008, 17:00
Re: Rotate Buildings
then... can we press the arrow keys to rotate?
-
winsrp
- Trained

- Posts: 417
- Joined: 14 May 2008, 17:00
Re: Rotate Buildings
maybe ctrl+right click... how about that?
-
Kamaze
- Regular

- Posts: 1017
- Joined: 30 Jul 2006, 15:23
Re: Rotate Buildings
What about holding the LMB while tapping the RMB for rotating.
We all have the same heaven, but not the same horizon.
-
Zarel
- Elite

- Posts: 5770
- Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
- Location: Minnesota, USA
Re: Rotate Buildings
...no? Orientation is already saved everywhere; there's just no way to do it in the UI.cybersphinx wrote:But we need a new savegame revision for the orientation, don't we?
1. Click-drag. For defenses, it builds a row. For base structures, it rotates.Per wrote:How would you make the UI for rotating a building construction order?
2. Alternatively, ctrl+arrows or shift+arrows or alt+arrows while a structure is selected.
Maybe both.
I don't know why people are suggesting all these other weird ideas like right click that don't work at all. The last time we talked about rotating buildings, the above two were the best ideas.
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Rotate Buildings
I think that click-drag is the best option, as it allows for quick determination of the direction (we wouldn't need arrows indicating the direction or a building "ghost"). Click & drag to the direction where you want the exit to point to, quick and simple, no confusion.
Is it practical to make such a feature work? :rolleyes:
Is it practical to make such a feature work? :rolleyes: