Commanders: who actually uses them??

Other talk that doesn't fit elsewhere.
This is for General Discussion, not General chat.
icyflames
Trained
Trained
Posts: 46
Joined: 28 Aug 2009, 13:22

Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by icyflames »

Trying to use these things in campaign, (mainly to accrue experience for no apparent reason). Absolutely despise them, because although they may bring enhancements to unit strength, but they are an absolute nightmare to control.

Units already have this tendency to get stuck and that annoying need to go forward first before retreating. The commander just gets in the way, and because you can't control individual assigned units, positioning becomes impossible as well.

Not sure why Pumpkins made such a big point of them. Does anyone have some remote use for them??
User avatar
Terminator
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1077
Joined: 05 Aug 2006, 13:46
Location: Ukraine
Contact:

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by Terminator »

I didn't use them at all until last week. I tryed.....and I like the whole idea of Commanders, but cause of many bugs & bad balance of the game makes them useless. I hope in warzone's future they will be developed better then right now.
I think Commanders just should be reworked properly.
Death is the only way out... sh*t Happens !

Russian-speaking Social network Group http://vk.com/warzone2100
themousemaster
Regular
Regular
Posts: 611
Joined: 10 Nov 2006, 16:54

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by themousemaster »

Once you learn the finer points of unit control, the bonus to strength and auto-return of repair and production turn out quite useful.

Specifically, to counter the "wanting to rush in front" problem commanders have, be sure to always have them "attack" their target from far away. Since their "range" is so much farther than any other weapon, they will end up stopping well outside of enemy range, and the rest of the battalion will take their proper positions.
User avatar
Revelo
Trained
Trained
Posts: 112
Joined: 28 May 2009, 19:06
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by Revelo »

Once you get used to using them I found they are very useful for having around. I like having them to help with co-ordination for my units and i enjoy the bonuses they offer.
Read my review of Warzone 2100 here!
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.115500
User avatar
Tenoh
Trained
Trained
Posts: 359
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 15:06

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by Tenoh »

Other then a delivery point i dont see any usefulness for them.Unless they will give good bonuses.
"No, you don't want to buy this Sh[beep]t from me. It shoots sideways, it was built by retard zombies in some f[beep]king outreach program." HL:G
icyflames
Trained
Trained
Posts: 46
Joined: 28 Aug 2009, 13:22

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by icyflames »

Meh I guess they're ok for automatic defence. Still think it's worthless when attacking any kind of fortification, and make hit and run impossible to coordinate properly.
User avatar
psychopompos
Trained
Trained
Posts: 470
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 09:18
Location: UK

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by psychopompos »

icyflames wrote:Meh I guess they're ok for automatic defence. Still think it's worthless when attacking any kind of fortification, and make hit and run impossible to coordinate properly.
just you send a moderately experienced commander to attack an enemy base when you have support fire enabled & artillery emplacements in range to hit what the commander is shooting ;)

defences? pah! flaming holes in the ground they'd be.
User avatar
Revelo
Trained
Trained
Posts: 112
Joined: 28 May 2009, 19:06
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by Revelo »

psychopompos wrote: just you send a moderately experienced commander to attack an enemy base when you have support fire enabled & artillery emplacements in range to hit what the commander is shooting ;)

defences? pah! flaming holes in the ground they'd be.
You sir speak the truth.

But what about in my case, where I send full ranked commanders I have had since Alpha 6 to attack? :P
Read my review of Warzone 2100 here!
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.115500
themousemaster
Regular
Regular
Posts: 611
Joined: 10 Nov 2006, 16:54

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by themousemaster »

icyflames wrote:Meh I guess they're ok for automatic defence. Still think it's worthless when attacking any kind of fortification, and make hit and run impossible to coordinate properly.

The easy way around this is, don't use them for Hit 'N run. leave that to unattached brigades, and use the commander for the heavy attacks.

Hit 'N run is mostly a MP strat anyway, and commanders in MP are much worse off than they are in Campaign.
User avatar
hawkn
Trained
Trained
Posts: 32
Joined: 18 Mar 2009, 00:14

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by hawkn »

so you can assign them to artillery for exp bonuses?
Speak softly, and carry a pair of lancers.
Kacen
Trained
Trained
Posts: 294
Joined: 19 Feb 2007, 19:28

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by Kacen »

The main problem with commanders is the assigning limit. You can only assign 6 units at first, and with every rank they go up you can assign 2 more.

But for most people, we need large attack squads fast, thus rendering the commander unused.
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA
Contact:

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by Zarel »

One person suggested increasing the initial assign limit of Command Turret II-IV. That's a pretty good idea, but we never got around to implementing it. :/
themousemaster
Regular
Regular
Posts: 611
Joined: 10 Nov 2006, 16:54

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by themousemaster »

In related news Zarel.... what was the current difference between turret I, II, III, and IV again? :P
User avatar
ClockWork
Trained
Trained
Posts: 219
Joined: 07 Sep 2008, 03:22
Location: USA

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by ClockWork »

themousemaster wrote:In related news Zarel.... what was the current difference between turret I, II, III, and IV again? :P
The hit points, I believe. It goes up 200 each time every "mark" is researched. So they become walls ‘o’ meat that can soak up lots ‘o’ damage.
useful for going head on against an artillery freak with ground units, or, generally against anything else,I suppose.
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA
Contact:

Re: Commanders: who actually uses them??

Post by Zarel »

As ClockWork said. Nothing but HP.
Post Reply