GPL v2 License Vs Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0 License

Other talk that doesn't fit elsewhere.
This is for General Discussion, not General chat.
User avatar
Black Project
Regular
Regular
Posts: 751
Joined: 04 Apr 2008, 20:53

GPL v2 License Vs Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0 License

Post by Black Project »

Which license is better to apply in mods to Warzone 2100?

GPL v2 or Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0

Advantages and Disadvantages?

Regards BP
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: GPL v2 License Vs Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0 License

Post by Zarel »

You could always dual-license. If you ask me, I'd suggest you go with CC0 if you don't care about licensing.
cybersphinx
Inactive
Inactive
Posts: 1695
Joined: 01 Sep 2006, 19:17

Re: GPL v2 License Vs Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0 License

Post by cybersphinx »

Two points to consider:
  • The GPL was written with code in mind, the CC licenses with art.
  • If you use material (images etc.) from other people, you have to honor their license terms.
Per
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Posts: 3780
Joined: 03 Aug 2006, 19:39

Re: GPL v2 License Vs Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0 License

Post by Per »

Note that if you use works that are already one of these license, you must use changed versions of them under the same license. And it is hard to make a substantial mod (ie something more than a map) without reusing some of the original GPL'ed works. So you probably have to either make your mod GPL or part GPL, part CC BY-SA.