Argh! Can't wait till it's finished
Super Transport model submissions for 3.1
-
i-NoD
- Code contributor

- Posts: 318
- Joined: 30 Nov 2008, 00:42
- Location: In the middle of nowhere
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Serious work Olrox!
Argh! Can't wait till it's finished
Argh! Can't wait till it's finished
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Thanks guys!
Let's see if my inspiration keeps up until next weekend and if my skills ain't rusted too much
Let's see if my inspiration keeps up until next weekend and if my skills ain't rusted too much
-
macuser
- Regular

- Posts: 1052
- Joined: 19 Mar 2010, 23:35
- Location: USA
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Hi Olrox, Berg. Nice to see you. BTW excelent model Olrox
ArtRev Website

System: AMD Phenom II x4, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD, Nvidia GeForce GT 240 1GB, Mac OS X 10.6

System: AMD Phenom II x4, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD, Nvidia GeForce GT 240 1GB, Mac OS X 10.6
-
lav_coyote25
- Professional

- Posts: 3434
- Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 23:18
Re: Super Transport model submissions
http://www.gizmag.com/hybrid-air-vehicl ... hip/19746/
just to keep you in the loop... found this on gizmag....
just to keep you in the loop... found this on gizmag....
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Hey lav, nice to see you still 'round shaking things up a bit
I think I've had already seen that one, but probably gas-lifted aircraft wouldn't be truly suitable for tactical use as we see in WZ. Probably they'd be rather used in a strategical scale, deploying troops and supplies farther from the frontlines, where the threats from AA and Air-to-Air defenses would be minimal (since I can't imagine an efficient way to armor-plate such floating craft cuz the surface is way too big and anti-practical in terms of ballistics - thinking about the angle between most incoming fire and the surface of the "hull" itself).
Can't help but relate that tech's current application to my previous ideas:
Maybe if we could have some properly strategical MP gameplay on warzone (which we sincerely don't have actually, sincerely - I think that's a common sense, right?) those would really make sense, but that whole strategical gameplay talk is enough for a whole topic right? I do think it makes sense, if the true role of that kind of tech is accounted for, to some extent.
I actually imagine that pumpkin itself had thought about that when they were making their own model, since I can only remember one mission (Alpha 6 or 7 if I'm not mistaken, the one where you finally recover Synaptic Link tech) where the transporter is actually shot at by defenses when passing near the enemy base, and that other one on Beta 2 or 3 where the transporter is actually already shot down and you have to rescue the units. Other than that, the transporters were always routed through secure lines, hardly across the battlefield.
But, again, I think that we could make great use of tactical vehicle deployment resources. They could branch off into distinctive and certainly fun King-of-the-hill, capture-and-hold and probably many other rich and diversified gamestyles. And if nobody does that before I learn some decent programming skills, I will do that myself because I think it should be in-game from the very beginning
Resources have a great impact on gameplay, and I think that this kind of resource would make for a bombastic one. Zarel would probably kill me due to the balance changes that this could need, but hey, that would be really awesome IMHO.
For now, I'll keep working on the model in a very educated way and pretend it is meant to be some kind of eyecandy of something
I think I've had already seen that one, but probably gas-lifted aircraft wouldn't be truly suitable for tactical use as we see in WZ. Probably they'd be rather used in a strategical scale, deploying troops and supplies farther from the frontlines, where the threats from AA and Air-to-Air defenses would be minimal (since I can't imagine an efficient way to armor-plate such floating craft cuz the surface is way too big and anti-practical in terms of ballistics - thinking about the angle between most incoming fire and the surface of the "hull" itself).
Can't help but relate that tech's current application to my previous ideas:
Maybe if we could have some properly strategical MP gameplay on warzone (which we sincerely don't have actually, sincerely - I think that's a common sense, right?) those would really make sense, but that whole strategical gameplay talk is enough for a whole topic right? I do think it makes sense, if the true role of that kind of tech is accounted for, to some extent.
I actually imagine that pumpkin itself had thought about that when they were making their own model, since I can only remember one mission (Alpha 6 or 7 if I'm not mistaken, the one where you finally recover Synaptic Link tech) where the transporter is actually shot at by defenses when passing near the enemy base, and that other one on Beta 2 or 3 where the transporter is actually already shot down and you have to rescue the units. Other than that, the transporters were always routed through secure lines, hardly across the battlefield.
But, again, I think that we could make great use of tactical vehicle deployment resources. They could branch off into distinctive and certainly fun King-of-the-hill, capture-and-hold and probably many other rich and diversified gamestyles. And if nobody does that before I learn some decent programming skills, I will do that myself because I think it should be in-game from the very beginning
Resources have a great impact on gameplay, and I think that this kind of resource would make for a bombastic one. Zarel would probably kill me due to the balance changes that this could need, but hey, that would be really awesome IMHO.
For now, I'll keep working on the model in a very educated way and pretend it is meant to be some kind of eyecandy of something
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Some updates on the development, using some materials to fake the main colouring layout I'm thinking about:
~Olrox
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Goth Zagog-Thou
- Regular

- Posts: 1582
- Joined: 06 Jan 2007, 08:08
- Location: Delta Base
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Oh holy crap that's nice!
Awesome job!
-
lav_coyote25
- Professional

- Posts: 3434
- Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 23:18
Re: Super Transport model submissions
yes - it is awesome - now, can you point out the various areas on the aircraft - ie: cockpit, cargo areas... etc.
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Will do, maybe it'll end up a nice concept art, after all 
-
Berg
- Regular

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: 02 Sep 2007, 23:25
- Location: Australia
Re: Super Transport model submissions
IF you do it up with the dust and fog like that tank you did a while back it should be excitingOlrox wrote:Will do, maybe it'll end up a nice concept art, after all
By the way how many polygon is this model?
Regards Berg
-
vexed
- Inactive

- Posts: 2538
- Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:07
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Nice Olrox, how big is this on WZ's scale ?
/facepalm ...Grinch stole Warzone

contra principia negantem non est disputandum
Super busy, don't expect a timely reply back.
Super busy, don't expect a timely reply back.
-
Olrox
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Hmm, since I'm doing this high poly, unlike everything I've already have done here, probably it will make much more sense to go on and make some nice renders out of it, yeah. This model currently has over 210k polygons, which is actually low for a high-poly of this size. I'm currently adding the greater, decisive details so that I can go on and slice them into smaller, texture-like details. With that, I wouldn't be surprised if I reached over 1kk polys. But, since that's a (roughly) 5x5 tile model, I'll put a final limit of 512 polys in the end, aiming to 256 as long as it doesn't lose significant geometry details. Hmmm, I can't recall if there's a nasty poly-count limit in .pies, you surely would know if there is such thing, right?Berg wrote:IF you do it up with the dust and fog like that tank you did a while back it should be excitingOlrox wrote:Will do, maybe it'll end up a nice concept art, after all
By the way how many polygon is this model?
Regards Berg
Anyway, I've done some sketchy-blueprint-like-thingy to satisfy Lav's wishes and take the chance to re-think the whole design. Please don't mind the coffee stains
Here it is:
answer is above in italicvexed wrote:Nice Olrox, how big is this on WZ's scale ?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
lav_coyote25
- Professional

- Posts: 3434
- Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 23:18
Re: Super Transport model submissions
AWESOME!!!!!!!! thanks. 
-
Jorzi
- Regular

- Posts: 2063
- Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 00:14
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Excellent stuff
The hard limits right now are 512 triangles, 768 vertices and 1024x1024 texture size. I guess that with a 5x5 model, you really should aim for using everything within this limit.


-insert deep philosophical statement here-
-
MaNGusT
- Art contributor
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 10:31
- Location: Russia
Re: Super Transport model submissions
Olrox wrote:Hmmm, I can't recall if there's a nasty poly-count limit in .pies, you surely would know if there is such thing, right?
Jorzi wrote:Excellent stuffThe hard limits right now are 512 triangles, 768 vertices and 1024x1024 texture size. I guess that with a 5x5 model, you really should aim for using everything within this limit.