New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
- n2large0shirt
- Trained
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 07:08
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
They do look like moths I will give it another try...
~Elderly before my time.~
- n2large0shirt
- Trained
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 07:08
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
A little less moth like?
Still trying to figure out blender too... I think maybe I could recreate things with blocks, if it were just that easy.
Based on this body...
I don't really like the way this one turned out either. I'm not really very good at art, of any sort it turns out. Still trying to figure out blender too... I think maybe I could recreate things with blocks, if it were just that easy.
~Elderly before my time.~
-
- Greenhorn
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 07 Sep 2010, 16:03
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
i VERY like if developer create new icons and User interface
View the New game menu UI concept in Artwork
View the New game menu UI concept in Artwork
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
Yeah i took the file direct from the WZ directory. And I forgot that black mostly is invisibleBuginator wrote:Nice job guys!
CinC, the first icon's color doesn't match Wz's color scheme, any reason for it ?
I know thats it looks like a plane, that was the intention behind. (Because many VTOLs are planes, but they don't need a runway e.g. Harrier, or the F22 Raptor. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VTOL))Square wrote:I like it, though it doesnt look that much like a VTOL
But since many non-english (and maybe even english) speaking players, don't even know what VTOLS are ("that's a plane, ain't it?") it doesnt matter...
So... I like it!
But i restyled my model a little, hope it looks now more like a VTOL...
VTOL on VTOL off
Do what ever you think is right.Buginator wrote:Also, how do you guys want to be credited when we use these icons ?
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
It looks good either way.
ArtRev Website
System: AMD Phenom II x4, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD, Nvidia GeForce GT 240 1GB, Mac OS X 10.6
System: AMD Phenom II x4, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD, Nvidia GeForce GT 240 1GB, Mac OS X 10.6
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
I can't find a "no license" policy on Uncyclopedia - most of it's CC-BY-NC. Can you just use CC-0?Jorzi wrote:I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
Is that no-licence thingy not just the same as public domain?Zarel wrote:I can't find a "no license" policy on Uncyclopedia - most of it's CC-BY-NC. Can you just use CC-0?Jorzi wrote:I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
Well, it matches the description he gave us the best.Hiram wrote:Is that no-licence thingy not just the same as public domain?
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Template:NoLicense
The funniest license yet
The funniest license yet
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
It fails to take into account that any Berne Convention signatory state (i.e. pretty much every country, including the US) has automatic copyright, and so "no license" means "no one is allowed to use this".Jorzi wrote:http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Template:NoLicense
The funniest license yet
Funny, but clearly not written by someone who understands copyright law, and so insufficient as a license. Again, if you're looking for a "do anything you want" license, I recommend CC-0.
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
yeah, whatever cc-0 it is, then
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
Zarel loves his CC-0 doesn't heJorzi wrote:yeah, whatever cc-0 it is, then
"...If pure awesomeness were bricks, this would be the Great Wall of China...
The glory of this has collapsed on its self so far, that even the neutrons have collapsed."
The glory of this has collapsed on its self so far, that even the neutrons have collapsed."
-
- Inactive
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: 01 Sep 2006, 19:17
- Rman Virgil
- Professional
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: 25 Sep 2006, 01:06
- Location: USA
Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)
.
Impact = C x (R + E + A + T + E)
Contrast
Reach
Exposure
Articulation
Trust
Echo
.
Impact = C x (R + E + A + T + E)
Contrast
Reach
Exposure
Articulation
Trust
Echo
.