New feature: Challenges

Discuss the future of Warzone 2100 with us.
PC89
Greenhorn
Posts: 13
Joined: 17 Sep 2009, 14:13

Re: New feature: Challenges

Post by PC89 »

Excellent idea!!! When do you think this challenge idea will be implemented?

Perhaps include ONE challenge at least for the next version release and see how it goes?
Per
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Posts: 3780
Joined: 03 Aug 2006, 19:39

Re: New feature: Challenges

Post by Per »

PC89 wrote:Excellent idea!!! When do you think this challenge idea will be implemented?
Thanks. It is already implemented. It will be in the next major release.
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: New feature: Challenges

Post by Zarel »

Per wrote:Thanks. It is already implemented. It will be in the next major release.
Do you think you can backport it to 2.3?
guciomir
Trained
Trained
Posts: 133
Joined: 05 May 2009, 22:27

Re: New feature: Challenges

Post by guciomir »

would it be possible to add more predefined structures and units to enemy? (so AI would have another advantage, like some guarding towers near oil derrics, like some additional tanks etc)
Per
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Posts: 3780
Joined: 03 Aug 2006, 19:39

Re: New feature: Challenges

Post by Per »

guciomir wrote:would it be possible to add more predefined structures and units to enemy? (so AI would have another advantage, like some guarding towers near oil derrics, like some additional tanks etc)
You can do this if you create a custom version of the map. Once we get better scripting support, we might think about scripting challenges.
Zarel wrote:Do you think you can backport it to 2.3?
Backporting to the 2.2 branch would take a lot of work. It partially builds upon some other trunk-only changes (iniparser and the dpid-b-gone for the most part).
-Kosh-
Trained
Trained
Posts: 203
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 23:34

Re: New feature: Challenges

Post by -Kosh- »

Per wrote: Backporting to the 2.2 branch would take a lot of work. It partially builds upon some other trunk-only changes (iniparser and the dpid-b-gone for the most part).
I take it that means no?
Is there a ETA for 2.3?
This is a waste of space. Something important should be here.
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: New feature: Challenges

Post by Zarel »

Per wrote:Backporting to the 2.2 branch would take a lot of work. It partially builds upon some other trunk-only changes (iniparser and the dpid-b-gone for the most part).
Can we backport those, too, then?
-Kosh-
Trained
Trained
Posts: 203
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 23:34

Re: New feature: Challenges

Post by -Kosh- »

Zarel wrote:Can we backport those, too, then?
I looked at Changeset 7678 and good luck!
This is a waste of space. Something important should be here.