labels.ini

[aubergine]

Do the section names in labels.ini have any significance?

An example of some labels from cam1a's labels.ini:

Code: Select all

[position_0]
pos = 5184, 2112
label = "artifact1pos"

[position_1]
pos = 2496, 4032
label = "artifact2pos"

[position_2]
pos = 1856, 1600
label = "artifact3pos"

I wasn't sure if there was some significance to calling all position labels [position_X] where X is an incrementing number.

Also, does the numbering need to be contiguous?

[Per]

The numbering does not need to be contiguous, just unique. The word in front, of course, denotes what kind of label it is. So, yes, the section name matters.

[aubergine]

Thanks for info.

In future version would there be a willingness to alter labels.ini so it's more like this?

Code: Select all

[artifact2pos]
pos = 2496, 4032
type = POSITION

Just seems more semantic to use label name, which is unique, as section title and then specify the type along with other data.

[vexed]

The stuff in the brackets is what the C++ code looks to find.
If you name it anything, then you need a way to tell the code what it should be scanning for.
Same with the stuff below the brackets, you can't name it anything you want, for the same reason.