Per wrote:
What was so great about that book? I thought it was rather shallow, and couldn't even finish it.
* If you're refering to "A Hacker Manifesto", I sorta agree. (see**)
* But "Gamer Theory" is a whole other story - a quantum leap in this Aussie's intellectual evolution & by any rigorous literary metric, superb, profound, & John Coltrane jazzy-tasty.
* I'd say in the same phylum as Douglas Hoffstader's classic, "Godel, Escher, Bach: The Eternal Golden Braid" or Robert Pirsig's "Zen & the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" or Carse's "Finite & Infinite Games", IMHO.
- RV
** EDIT: I should, I will, qualify that assessment in all fairness to authors maturing thought over the years.
* I agree as far as v.1.0 of "AHM" published some 4 years ago (if I recall)..... the latest (available only in electronic form) v.4.0 has much to recommend it in substance..... (basically that intellectual property creates "class" divisions) though, again, some (25% ?) are turned-off by the style of discourse which is admittidly experimental.... going so far as to compare it to a failed attempt at Biblical Quatrains.
* Plus I think some few self-proclaimed "hackers" have an over-inflated self-image bordering on delusions of grandeur & even hinting at that "master-race" psychosis (though they like to see themselves as Cyber Robin Hoods) which leads them to believe that nobody can trully express what goes on in their skulls 'cept themselves & yet they don't bother to unless you include proclamations of moral & intellectual superiority, IMHO.
* 'Course if they indulged as much in nookie exploration & as in code jacking manipulation their perspective would probably be a little more level-headed (oddly enough, as a direct result of explosive carnal relief with non-inflateable, thoroughly agreeable, cheer-leader type babes).
* Again, these are just my humble opinions & like the expression goes - opinions are like arses, everybodys got one.
.
Impact = C x (R + E + A + T + E)
Contrast
Reach
Exposure
Articulation
Trust
Echo
.