Structures by design

For code related discussions and questions
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by aubergine »

One last point to my last two posts on the previous page, I think that size (light, medium, heavy and super) should be separate from propulsion or body.

Also, here is an early preview of my spreadsheet: https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/disp ... preadsheet
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
User avatar
Shadow Wolf TJC
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1047
Joined: 16 Apr 2011, 05:12
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: Structures by design

Post by Shadow Wolf TJC »

aubergine wrote:A propulsion therefore defines:

* What sort of bodies can be applied
* What sort of turrets can be applied

The body defines:

* How many turrets can be applied
Er, whenever we design a new vehicle in-game, we need to pick the body 1st, then the propulsion, and finally, the turret(s), so shouldn't it be more like this?
The body defines:

* What sort of propulsions can be applied
* How many turrets can be applied

The propulsion defines:

* What sort of turrets can be applied
Creator of Warzone 2100: Contingency!
Founder of Wikizone 2100: http://wikizone2100.wikia.com/wiki/Wikizone_2100
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by aubergine »

Yes, from the user perspective the body defines what propulsion/turret can be used. But I think from the code perspective propulsions should be the dominant factor, primarily because there are less propulsions than there are bodies or turrets.
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
User avatar
Berg
Regular
Regular
Posts: 2204
Joined: 02 Sep 2007, 23:25
Location: Australia

Re: Structures by design

Post by Berg »

aubergine wrote:primarily because there are less propulsions than there are bodies or turrets.
I might be wrong but each body size has 5 propulsion types

wheel, halftrack ,tanktrack, hover and vtol.
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by aubergine »

Here is a list of bodies: viewtopic.php?f=32&t=8927&start=15#p96080

And that list excludes all the normal base buildings (sat uplink, factories, etc) so there are actually a lot more bodies that I've not yet listed.

Here is a list of propulsions:

* Planet
* Building
* Defence
* Barrier
* BaBaProp
* BaBaLegs
* CyborgLegs
* CyborgJets
* wheeled0
* hover01
* HalfTrack
* tracked01
* V–Tol
* Naval

Each propulsion has a number of "sizes" used just to determine the 3D model that gets used. The propulsion size is determined by the body size. (some related discussion: viewtopic.php?f=33&t=5136&start=1035 )
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
Reg312
Regular
Regular
Posts: 681
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 18:36

Re: Structures by design

Post by Reg312 »

Added new buttons to unit design GUI:
Attachments
wz2100-20120228_033523-Sk-Rush.png
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by aubergine »

AWESOME!!!
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
User avatar
Iluvalar
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1828
Joined: 02 Oct 2010, 18:44

Re: Structures by design

Post by Iluvalar »

aubergine wrote: * Planet
* Building
* Defence
* Barrier
What do you have against "hard","medium","soft" and "bunker" like it is right now ?
Heretic 2.3 improver and proud of it.
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by aubergine »

I don;t have anything against them, however it just seemed overly complex from a propulsions perspective in my script.

Essentially I'm trying to get a dynamic research system that revolves around propulsions - so having just "Defence" and "Barrier" for all the towers, walls, etc., made life a lot easier in terms of categorising stuff. I'm not sure it's the right approach yet - I still need to do loads of investigation and experimentation and work (real life) is going to be mad busy this week so it's going to be a while before I can say for sure what works best (from my perspective at least).

I'm certainly open to suggestions and ideas - if possible I'd like to come up with something that works for everyone as that makes all the time I'm spending on this much more worthwhile.
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
User avatar
Emdek
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1329
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 13:14
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by Emdek »

Reg312 wrote:Added new buttons to unit design GUI
Nice, missing thing is own new design button (that green blueprint), own body button (that one for vehicles doesn't really fit there) and moving up weapon button.
Nadszedł już czas, najwyższy czas, nienawiść zniszczyć w sobie.
The time has come, the high time, to destroy hatred in oneself.


Beware! Mad Qt Evangelist.
Reg312
Regular
Regular
Posts: 681
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 18:36

Re: Structures by design

Post by Reg312 »

Emdek wrote:
Reg312 wrote:Added new buttons to unit design GUI
Nice, missing thing is own new design button (that green blueprint), own body button (that one for vehicles doesn't really fit there) and moving up weapon button.
this things is just visible stuff and dont need change code
.....
i dont know how make models and i think someone from community can make default structure mode (blueprint)
i think we dont need move weapon button up
"own body button" - i dont know what pictire should be used as "structure body", suggestions? examples?
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by aubergine »

I prefer weapon button where it is - it's consistent with droid designer UI.
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
User avatar
Emdek
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1329
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 13:14
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by Emdek »

aubergine, that empty space is ugly. ;-)
Also it is not consistent, it would be if it would follow placing of buttons in groups like units designer does.
Reg312, maybe tower or bunker image for that body / propulsion button?
Nadszedł już czas, najwyższy czas, nienawiść zniszczyć w sobie.
The time has come, the high time, to destroy hatred in oneself.


Beware! Mad Qt Evangelist.
Reg312
Regular
Regular
Posts: 681
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 18:36

Re: Structures by design

Post by Reg312 »

Emdek wrote: Reg312, maybe tower or bunker image for that body / propulsion button?
i've tried create hardpoint icon but i've got ugly icon
so i need icon 20x30 or 25x40 in warone style
i'm full noob with image editing :)
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Structures by design

Post by aubergine »

What about using the small icons you see on the research tab for weapons and structures?

Body icon (blue bunker icon at top-left):

Image

Weapon turret icon:

Image

Systems turret icon:

Image
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
Post Reply