Warzone 2100 Forums

Fixed

Is the credits file the only change in alpha 3?

Actually, the only difference should be cleaned-up shader as well as slightly smaller file size due to shrinking the transport texture to 1024 resolution.

aubergine wrote:Is the credits file the only change in alpha 3?

Nice joke

Well, that's the only change SF was reporting heh.

MaNGusT when did you go onto dark side

Merowingg wrote:MaNGusT when did you go onto dark side

10 years ago, when I bought my 1st electro guitar.

Ah now I understand

Gentlemen any screens of latest work? And not concrete walls

Intresting.
The mod doesnt appear to work correctly. It loads up OK in the load/chat box at the bottom of the screen BUT the units and building are the normal vanilla models. However AR_alpha 2 works fine. I am only using the AR mods.

Ah thanks for reporting, I accidentally added the whole folder to the zip instead of just its contents. Anyway, should be reuploaded now

where do i see the changelog?, browse 'recent activity' manually or..

I'm afraid so..
Maybe I should write one?

Jorzi wrote:I'm afraid so..
Maybe I should write one?

nvm i just took a look at artrev's to-do list, currently waiting for factory model

This mod looks pretty good! The only thing I wonder about is - why does it slow down the fps so much? Assuming a smaller part of the map in view would help to raise the fps again - the closer look, the smaller view distance does not bring better fps. O.o Edit: The Python body + half tracks is missing the front tracks.

themac wrote:This mod looks pretty good! The only thing I wonder about is - why does it slow down the fps so much? Assuming a smaller part of the map in view would help to raise the fps again - the closer look, the smaller view distance does not bring better fps. O.o

because of an old unoptimized renderer. It doesn't use the possibilities of the new hardware.