Warzone 2100 Forums

They do look like moths I will give it another try...

A little less moth like? Based on this body... I don't really like the way this one turned out either. I'm not really very good at art, of any sort it turns out.

Still trying to figure out blender too... I think maybe I could recreate things with blocks, if it were just that easy.

i VERY like if developer create new icons and User interface

View the New game menu UI concept in Artwork

Buginator wrote:Nice job guys!
CinC, the first icon's color doesn't match Wz's color scheme, any reason for it ?

Yeah i took the file direct from the WZ directory. And I forgot that black mostly is invisible

Square wrote:I like it, though it doesnt look that much like a VTOL
But since many non-english (and maybe even english) speaking players, don't even know what VTOLS are ("that's a plane, ain't it?") it doesnt matter...

So... I like it!

I know thats it looks like a plane, that was the intention behind. (Because many VTOLs are planes, but they don't need a runway e.g. Harrier, or the F22 Raptor. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VTOL))

But i restyled my model a little, hope it looks now more like a VTOL...
VTOL on VTOL off

Buginator wrote:Also, how do you guys want to be credited when we use these icons ?

Do what ever you think is right.

It looks good either way.

I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.

Jorzi wrote:I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.

I can't find a "no license" policy on Uncyclopedia - most of it's CC-BY-NC. Can you just use CC-0?

Zarel wrote:

Jorzi wrote:I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.

I can't find a "no license" policy on Uncyclopedia - most of it's CC-BY-NC. Can you just use CC-0?

Is that no-licence thingy not just the same as public domain?

Hiram wrote:Is that no-licence thingy not just the same as public domain?

Well, it matches the description he gave us the best.

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Template:NoLicense
The funniest license yet

Jorzi wrote:http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Template:NoLicense
The funniest license yet

It fails to take into account that any Berne Convention signatory state (i.e. pretty much every country, including the US) has automatic copyright, and so "no license" means "no one is allowed to use this".

Funny, but clearly not written by someone who understands copyright law, and so insufficient as a license. Again, if you're looking for a "do anything you want" license, I recommend CC-0.

yeah, whatever cc-0 it is, then

Jorzi wrote:yeah, whatever cc-0 it is, then

Zarel loves his CC-0 doesn't he

.

cybersphinx wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL

Cool-a-mundo.

Frack CC-O.

.