Commander overhaul, mark one.

Discuss the future of Warzone 2100 with us.
User avatar
Tenoh
Trained
Trained
Posts: 359
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 15:06

Re: Commander overhaul, mark one.

Post by Tenoh »

Even I agree thats its a good start.
"No, you don't want to buy this Sh[beep]t from me. It shoots sideways, it was built by retard zombies in some f[beep]king outreach program." HL:G
Zarax
Trained
Trained
Posts: 122
Joined: 16 Feb 2010, 11:54

Re: Commander overhaul, mark one.

Post by Zarax »

Another small thing you might want to do is to extend the range that attacking units can move beyond the commander.

It doesn't need to be much, but I think you may have noticed that at maximum range you get flamer units turning back just a few tiles from the enemy, which is annoying and makes them very difficult to use under a commander.

(That and please please fix the bug where units go to "do or die" stance if they get stuck somewhere. I lost a special commander to that in beta 3).
ragnar
Greenhorn
Posts: 11
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 20:21

Re: Commander overhaul, mark one.

Post by ragnar »

It's a start.

In MP, they'll still die quickly because they stick out so much. A few years back in my local group, we added commander turrets to the game that looked like heavy cannon, gauss, scourge and pulse laser turrets (those being the weapons of choice at the time). They still stuck out because we didn't know how to fix the targeting FX to something not quite so obvious, but it helped.
User avatar
psychopompos
Trained
Trained
Posts: 470
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 09:18
Location: UK

Re: Commander overhaul, mark one.

Post by psychopompos »

intelligent fire support would be good.
since in a base assault the fire support is a major advantage, trouble is they seem to call support from every arty emplacment that can hit the painted target.
it would also be useful if they could share line of sight at least with sensor turrets.

Zarax wrote:Another small thing you might want to do is to extend the range that attacking units can move beyond the commander.

It doesn't need to be much, but I think you may have noticed that at maximum range you get flamer units turning back just a few tiles from the enemy, which is annoying and makes them very difficult to use under a commander.
i thought that was already fixed by giving the flamers a lil extra range?
ragnar wrote:A few years back in my local group, we added commander turrets to the game that looked like heavy cannon, gauss, scourge and pulse laser turrets .
sounds interesting to say the least
MOTHERBOARD - MSI P7N PLATINUM¦-¦PROCESSOR - C2D E7300 @ 4.00GHZ
MEMORY - 4 Gig (2x2gig) ddr2 1066mhz¦-¦OPERATING SYSTEM - WINDOWS 7 (ULT)
GRAPHICS - BFG GTX 260 OCX (requires ForceWare drivers for good openGL)
Vibonacci
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 18:48

Re: Commander overhaul, mark one.

Post by Vibonacci »

ragnar wrote:It's a start.

In MP, they'll still die quickly because they stick out so much. A few years back in my local group, we added commander turrets to the game that looked like heavy cannon, gauss, scourge and pulse laser turrets (those being the weapons of choice at the time). They still stuck out because we didn't know how to fix the targeting FX to something not quite so obvious, but it helped.
Please just DO NOT SUGGEST to remove the pew pew pew animation of the commander :twisted:
User avatar
KenAlcock
Trained
Trained
Posts: 198
Joined: 25 Nov 2009, 03:50
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA

Re: Commander overhaul, mark one.

Post by KenAlcock »

Both ideas sound like a very good start. :)
My game handle is Cosmic Raven or Cosmic Raven 68