New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wanted

Roux Le Corps · Post by **Roux Le Corps** » 28 May 2010, 18:34

ooooh i like the borg factory!

Arcalane · Post by **Arcalane** » 29 May 2010, 05:40

The cyborg factory might need a bigger exit - it looks like it could be a bit of a squeeze for Supers coming out of there.

As for the rest of the stuff; the walls are nice - I think the simplicity works well, and they look good and solid, but everything else bugs me. A lot of them don't really 'leap out' so to speak, and don't make it obvious what they are at a glance. They look more practical and realistic, but it detracts a bit from easy identification.

As for the textures, window sizes need to be more consistent between areas of buildings and overall (for example, the science lab has six big windows on the lower building, four and a half on one of the upper parts, and six smaller squished up ones on another upper part) - and at a long-distance glance, the mechanical arm in the factory ends up looking like a pile of scrap blocking the exit.

...and the leopard print (that's what it is, admit it) looks really silly.

NEXUS · Post by **NEXUS** » 30 May 2010, 23:12

Looks good so far, but the team colours need to be less bright on the units IMO

The models however, are very nice.

Post by **Berg** » 05 Jun 2010, 12:37

Got distracted from structures and did a few droid propulsions

http://i47.tinypic.com/3329uue.jpg

Spik3d · Post by **Spik3d** » 05 Jun 2010, 16:03

I like the new track covers a lot more than those in the previous pages.

MetalWarrior95 · Post by **MetalWarrior95** » 05 Jun 2010, 16:34

Berg wrote:Got distracted from structures and did a few droid propulsions http://i47.tinypic.com/3329uue.jpg

It looks good but its anoying that propulsion,weapons are other color then armor,thats almost the main thing in the game that i hate!

Your propulsion models looks good but truck with viper armor that has so small whelled propulsion,it looks like builder would roll and stuck like,how i could describe it,like in a car accident upside down...

Post by **Jorzi** » 05 Jun 2010, 22:55

Those propulsion models are really good and they fit well with the original models. Only suggestion is to make the heavy tracks a tiny bit shorter

theArmourer · Post by **theArmourer** » 06 Jun 2010, 00:43

I think the wheels and half-tracks should have the same number of ... wheels.

Post by **Berg** » 06 Jun 2010, 04:13

Jorzi wrote:Those propulsion models are really good and they fit well with the original models. Only suggestion is to make the heavy tracks a tiny bit shorter

I do note about the large tracks but as these tracks are also used on a larger body making them fit will make them look to small for the other one see screenshot

http://i49.tinypic.com/33cc969.jpg

Post by **Jorzi** » 06 Jun 2010, 08:57

Hmm ok, I see

Post by **Berg** » 06 Jun 2010, 12:47

Dragon Tracks http://i50.tinypic.com/974gvs.jpg

only half the image shows so see more click on link supplied with each screenshot

MetalWarrior95 · Post by **MetalWarrior95** » 06 Jun 2010, 13:24

Well to be honest. it looks actualy retarded!
You should make proper whelled and track propulsion, for track propulsion i reccomend two tracks on each side,something like mammoth tank from RA i think...Also dragon armor looks stupid when its red and acualy looks llike a space ship.

Post by **stiv** » 06 Jun 2010, 16:54

Well to be honest. it looks actualy retarded!

A very insightful comment! Is that a term they taught you in art school?

JDW · Post by **JDW** » 06 Jun 2010, 19:25

Mr. Berg , you're a genius with modelling, simply amazing!!

Can someone please tell me if these models are available in 3.0 development branch? Is it possible to play the development branch?

Post by **MaNGusT** » 06 Jun 2010, 19:27

j0shdrunk0nwar wrote:Mr. Berg , you're a genius with modelling, simply amazing!!

Can someone please tell me if these models are available in 3.0 development branch? Is it possible to play the development branch?

Warzone 2100 Forums

New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wanted

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa

Re: New Models for 3.0, that make use of the mask feature wa