didnt workzarulhairee wrote:probably the resolution? thats a bug, but temporary fix for you is try to reducing your graphic properties like from 32 bit to 16 bit. or from 1280X800 to 800X600. make sure to put those on ticket
New testing build for pre-3.0-1 is now up!
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
Hi. I'm new to the forums but I'm often on the #wz2100 channel (under the name de_jean_7777) so some of you may know me.
I've tested 3.0 and it crashes after some time, usually 5-10 seconds after I've started the campaign or skirmish. It always crashes. The PC is running XP SP3, with Intel 82945G (i945G) and a Pentium Dual Core E2220. The graphics drivers are the latest, though Intel has not updated them in quite some time (and most likely never will).
Changing graphics settings does not help at all. Sometimes It would crash during the loading screen with a run-time error message box (no details are provided).
Here is the log file.
I blame Intels shoddy OpenGL drivers on this.
Also, here's the RPT file: http://pastebin.com/G26Vz7YB
I've tested 3.0 and it crashes after some time, usually 5-10 seconds after I've started the campaign or skirmish. It always crashes. The PC is running XP SP3, with Intel 82945G (i945G) and a Pentium Dual Core E2220. The graphics drivers are the latest, though Intel has not updated them in quite some time (and most likely never will).
Changing graphics settings does not help at all. Sometimes It would crash during the loading screen with a run-time error message box (no details are provided).
Here is the log file.
Code: Select all
--- Starting log ---
info |11:58:02: [screenInitialise] Using VBO extension functions under the core names.
info |11:58:02: [screenInitialise] OpenGL 2.0 is not supported by your system, using fixed pipeline.
error |11:58:27: [TopLevelExceptionFilter] Exception handler failed to create file!
Also, here's the RPT file: http://pastebin.com/G26Vz7YB
Last edited by dbX on 20 Oct 2010, 00:14, edited 1 time in total.
All the sexy babes want me... to fix their PC.
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
this is awsome except for the sky glitch where at a cirtain angle, the sky is black, other than that, it is much more beautiful than the original one made in the 1990s! but considering how old the original game was made, it had pretty cool graphic before but are now obsolete.
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
also, it still needs HD cutscenes, but what was just released is a big step to getting to that point
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
i like how you added more players to the limit say adding the #'s between 8-2 however, i would like to know, would / could there be more than 8 players?
also i run my warzone on a dual PENTIUM core computer soo you cant really get much worse... and 3.0 works just fine, you know excluding the keyboard problems
also i run my warzone on a dual PENTIUM core computer soo you cant really get much worse... and 3.0 works just fine, you know excluding the keyboard problems
I'm not always on but when I am you know it.
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
With more than 8 players it would cause more sync issues and currently if you try to play with 8 players you have a high chance of crashing/freezes.Mr_E wrote:i like how you added more players to the limit say adding the #'s between 8-2 however, i would like to know, would / could there be more than 8 players?
-
- Inactive
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: 01 Sep 2006, 19:17
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
Yeah, crash in the graphics driver. If you ever wanted to switch to Linux, here's your chance, reportedly Intel graphics actually works there.dbX wrote:I blame Intels shoddy OpenGL drivers on this.
Not without a lot of work, the current maximum is quite hardcoded.Mr_E wrote:i would like to know, would / could there be more than 8 players?
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
Well, this is a work PC, and I like to play WZ during my nightshifts. I don't think they'd let me install Linux, though I use it at home (with a graphics card that actually works).cybersphinx wrote:Yeah, crash in the graphics driver. If you ever wanted to switch to Linux, here's your chance, reportedly Intel graphics actually works there.
All the sexy babes want me... to fix their PC.
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
wow well then, i was just suggesting after all, i think more ppl want to join games that have more than 8 ppl...
wait dbx... what do you mean "nightshifts" like a night guard? or something like that?
wait dbx... what do you mean "nightshifts" like a night guard? or something like that?
I'm not always on but when I am you know it.
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3227AniZIne wrote:ok... cant start the game... after i click the icon the screen flashes once changes the arrow to the game`s one then flashes again and nothing... that happens in a fraciton of a second
W7
Sure thing, as soon as you make them...phly95 wrote:also, it still needs HD cutscenes, but what was just released is a big step to getting to that point
Correct!dbX wrote:...
I blame Intels shoddy OpenGL drivers on this.
Also, here's the RPT file: http://pastebin.com/G26Vz7YB
This request belongs on http://sourceforge.net/apps/ideatorrent/warzone2100/ or viewforum.php?f=30 not here.Roach wrote:My only problem is Warzone 2100 is modding related and only wishes to increase the limit of design components,
Nope, non of that was changed. The new targeting code may have something to do with this though.Happy Camper wrote:Did you change the weapon ranges? I seems to me that some weapons have a rather limited range (machine gun tower, hpc hardpoint, tamk killer emplacement). Machine gun towers seem also to have a problem to shoot over walls (larger minimum shooting distance?).
Anyway, great work, I will continue testing!
I don't have time to fix them, but if anyone wants to do this...hao wrote:KenAlcock: True, looks like i have this problem as well (:
And i still have this problem New clear cliffs by Jorzi didn't make it to this version yet.
I don't have a problem with this, as long as the has no errors in it (read your log files), has a full base (so people can pick advanced bases and be all set like the stock maps), and everyone else likes the map.I know it's not very humble to ask for this, but ... maybe it could become a good example of an N-player map (N!=2,4,8) included in warzone2100-3.0?
and it ends here.
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
Maybe it could be made at least a little better by making cliffs a little darker compared to gravel/snow? This won't fix more complicated mountains, but at least make the game a little more obvious. Here's an image from the stock "Mountain" map: I can't exactly see from the screenshot on the right how did these trucks get over here. If i didn't know in advance, i'd rather believe they reached here from highground on the left.Buginator wrote:I don't have time to fix them, but if anyone wants to do this...hao wrote:KenAlcock: True, looks like i have this problem as well (:
And i still have this problem New clear cliffs by Jorzi didn't make it to this version yet.
By the way, something needs to be done to the decal marked with the blue circle. It looks very ... squared
Works for me The first two points, at leastBuginator wrote:I don't have a problem with this, as long as the has no errors in it (read your log files), has a full base (so people can pick advanced bases and be all set like the stock maps), and everyone else likes the map.I know it's not very humble to ask for this, but ... maybe it could become a good example of an N-player map (N!=2,4,8) included in warzone2100-3.0?
Maps | Tower Defense | NullBot AI | More NullBot AI | Scavs | More Scavs | Tilesets | Walkthrough | JSCam
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
i like the older textures better, just you know without the lines...
I'm not always on but when I am you know it.
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
let me suggest something, can the arcangels get their map wide range back?
I'm not always on but when I am you know it.
- Black Project
- Regular
- Posts: 745
- Joined: 04 Apr 2008, 20:53
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
No, that would mess with balancing. Ask Zarel why he reduced the Archangel range and you'll knowMr_E wrote:let me suggest something, can the arcangels get their map wide range back?
BP
Re: New testing build for 3.0 is now up!
so be it... i just love the rain
I'm not always on but when I am you know it.