Models by MaNGusT (AR)

Improving the artwork in Warzone2100 - not for mod discussions
User avatar
Olrox
Art contributor
Posts: 1999
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by Olrox »

Olrox wrote: I'll see if I have this version saved on my old pc after I'm back from school :P
Probably I have it :hmm:
I don't have it :(

Sorry :|

~Olrox
User avatar
macuser
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1052
Joined: 19 Mar 2010, 23:35
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by macuser »

I found it! Here it is :geek: :!!!:

-regards macuser
Attachments
ARold.zip
(2.18 MiB) Downloaded 475 times
ArtRev Website

ImageImage

System: AMD Phenom II x4, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD, Nvidia GeForce GT 240 1GB, Mac OS X 10.6
User avatar
MaNGusT
Art contributor
Posts: 1152
Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 10:31
Location: Russia

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by MaNGusT »

Fully symmetric model of the wall. :lecture:
Image
Image
User avatar
Olrox
Art contributor
Posts: 1999
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by Olrox »

MaNGusT wrote:Fully symmetric model of the wall. :lecture:
Image
That's REALLY good! :D

But, I must ask, you know, it's an old habit, etc., how many polys? 8)
I believe that the small reinforcement bars could be rendered into normal mapping :hmm:

~Olrox
User avatar
MaNGusT
Art contributor
Posts: 1152
Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 10:31
Location: Russia

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by MaNGusT »

Olrox wrote:That's REALLY good! :D

But, I must ask, you know, it's an old habit, etc., how many polys? 8)
I believe that the small reinforcement bars could be rendered into normal mapping :hmm:
Thanks. It has 234 triangles. I can reduce it more by removing "support foots" and, as you've already mentioned, move reinforcement bars into normal map texture. :)
Image
User avatar
Olrox
Art contributor
Posts: 1999
Joined: 03 Jul 2007, 19:10

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by Olrox »

MaNGusT wrote: Thanks. It has 234 triangles. I can reduce it more by removing "support foots" and, as you've already mentioned, move reinforcement bars into normal map texture. :)
Also, you'd most probably want to make those bigger concrete parts on the edges, as separate boxes that intersect the main wall, rather than extruded parts of the mesh (If you want I can illustrate that real quickly)

~Olrox
User avatar
MaNGusT
Art contributor
Posts: 1152
Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 10:31
Location: Russia

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by MaNGusT »

Olrox wrote:Also, you'd most probably want to make those bigger concrete parts on the edges, as separate boxes that intersect the main wall, rather than extruded parts of the mesh (If you want I can illustrate that real quickly)
I understand you. I'll try. :)
Last edited by MaNGusT on 24 May 2010, 16:54, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
macuser
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1052
Joined: 19 Mar 2010, 23:35
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by macuser »

Great it looks nice. better then mine because you have a texture :)

-regards macuser
ArtRev Website

ImageImage

System: AMD Phenom II x4, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD, Nvidia GeForce GT 240 1GB, Mac OS X 10.6
User avatar
Rider
Trained
Trained
Posts: 106
Joined: 31 May 2007, 16:06

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by Rider »

Am I correct in assuming that darker top bit will be teamcoloured in the engine?

Looks pretty cool so far. Some specular/normal maps can really make that look pretty epic.
User avatar
MaNGusT
Art contributor
Posts: 1152
Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 10:31
Location: Russia

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by MaNGusT »

Rider wrote:Am I correct in assuming that darker top bit will be teamcoloured in the engine?
Yes. :wink:
Image
User avatar
MaNGusT
Art contributor
Posts: 1152
Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 10:31
Location: Russia

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by MaNGusT »

There are two methods to make normal map texture. Each of them gives the same result.

1) I add all polys of model to 1 smooth group, choose necessary options, bake texture. texture shows correctly only if game engine will also add all polys of model to 1 smooth group.
2) I bake texture without smooth group. texture shows correctly in game only if model doesn't have smooth groups.

for me, the 1 variant seems better but with usual zoom it will be unnoticeable.
What variant should I choose? :)
Image
Jorzi
Regular
Regular
Posts: 2063
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 00:14

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by Jorzi »

May I suggest using an object space normal map instead. It will ignore any smoothing and overwrite the surface normal according to the object orientation. This is ideal for warzone since all objects are non-deforming.
If tangent space is the only available mapping, just do what you prefer, I can convert it in blender later.
ImageImage
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
User avatar
MaNGusT
Art contributor
Posts: 1152
Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 10:31
Location: Russia

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by MaNGusT »

Jorzi wrote:May I suggest using an object space normal map instead. It will ignore any smoothing and overwrite the surface normal according to the object orientation. This is ideal for warzone since all objects are non-deforming.
If tangent space is the only available mapping, just do what you prefer, I can convert it in blender later.
I have only - tangent, local xyz, screen, world.

Previously I talked about smooth groups. Models with normal maps look better if they have only 1 smooth group than without SG. :)
Image
Jorzi
Regular
Regular
Posts: 2063
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 00:14

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by Jorzi »

It's propably the local xyz option. Otherwise the "world" option will give the same result if your model is unrotated.
More info here http://www.surlybird.com/tutorials/Tang ... index.html
ImageImage
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
User avatar
MaNGusT
Art contributor
Posts: 1152
Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 10:31
Location: Russia

Re: models by MaNGusT

Post by MaNGusT »

Last edited by MaNGusT on 24 May 2010, 16:45, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Post Reply