Power #4 Paranoia
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
I think that even i had explained enough in this thread. Ok, i repeat again if you want.
This is the complete info i'm aware of, based on my talking to both sides' representatives. Is there anything new in this? I think i already told most of it in my posts in this thread.
Spoiler:
Maps | Tower Defense | NullBot AI | More NullBot AI | Scavs | More Scavs | Tilesets | Walkthrough | JSCam
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
Thank you NoQ.
Well, I don't see it here, nor in any thread that is public. unless you could point me it ?NoQ wrote:I think i already told most of it in my posts in this thread.
Heretic 2.3 improver and proud of it.
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
Emm sorry, maybe not in #4 in fact after all Anyway, i'm sure i said things like "he was warned many months ago" etc ...
Maps | Tower Defense | NullBot AI | More NullBot AI | Scavs | More Scavs | Tilesets | Walkthrough | JSCam
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
You had the explanation available for days before the whole thread was deleted.Iluvalar wrote:So nothing wrong that deserve an explanation happened in that topic ?
If you have idea of what happened, see NoQ's explanation. But if you think you can engage staff in a public debate over particular moderation decisions, then you are wrong. It does not, and cannot, work that way.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 678
- Joined: 29 Jul 2009, 18:01
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
As I have seen, and as it should be. Admin/Mods debate other Admin/Mods. Users take up discussion with said Admin/Mods against actions, though these discussions quickly attract trolls and flamers.
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
those who are observant saw the writing on the wall and the fallout became evident today.
to the rest of the brown nosers in this thread way to go asswipes.
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
You are right on this one. It can't work this way.Per wrote: But if you think you can engage staff in a public debate over particular moderation decisions, then you are wrong. It does not, and cannot, work that way.
Either :
A) Moderators act with a behavior that is not subject to debate.
B) You use dictatorship and hide informations to people.
I'm not debating about the decision to stop the tournament. And if you read correctly, I don't believe zydonk do it either. I don't care about D. at all. And I dont care about the tournament I was not even in it. I'm complaining about the way the decision was executed : Trough censorship.
I don't know were you come from, but in my culture, it's widely accepted that the rare benefits from censorship do not worth to accept it existence in the first place. I will not even argue about if it was right or not in this case, I'm complaining it's wrong all the way around.
I hope you understand that.
Heretic 2.3 improver and proud of it.
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
Yes. Your concern has been noted.Iluvalar wrote:I hope you understand that.
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
from my point of view problem was in lack of justification, but NoQ managed to formulate this justification
we are bad guys from tournament's organizers and we bypassed the rules
turned to dark side and twisted by D. guy
we are bad guys from tournament's organizers and we bypassed the rules
turned to dark side and twisted by D. guy
Spoiler:
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
Iluvalar: It was the way in which the decision was announced that irked me. Even then, I could see there was justification for the shut down, though I would have been happier with a more explicit explanation.
The point now is to see that this kind of high handed behaviour doesn't happen again. As Per argues, we can't change the past, only learn from it.
The point now is to see that this kind of high handed behaviour doesn't happen again. As Per argues, we can't change the past, only learn from it.
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
Interesting story. Bad fight.NoQ wrote:Spoiler:
"My IRC en multiplay naam is Andrie"
Groete Andrie
Groete Andrie
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
Yeah, that's sort of enough. It was known that such thread will only be allowed if certain conditions are fulfilled.allowing to create thread on forum with tournament's result
They don't. You still play, right? Only the forum thread part was affected.why game developers can dictate the rules of how to play and what players able to play
Maps | Tower Defense | NullBot AI | More NullBot AI | Scavs | More Scavs | Tilesets | Walkthrough | JSCam
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
technically is harder/impossible to disallow people to play warzoneNoQ wrote:They don't. You still play, right? Only the forum thread part was affected.why game developers can dictate the rules of how to play and what players able to play
Spoiler:
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
Reg312 wrote: 2. mr.D said his name also banned in lobby, he cannot create hosts under his D-name
now we know who is hacking the site and we also know you are willingly breaking the rules, yet this thread remains.Don't post messages for banned individuals. Don't hack into any part of the site.
Re: Power #4 Paranoia
What? Nobody hacked the site. It was being improved.Paul wrote:Reg312 wrote: 2. mr.D said his name also banned in lobby, he cannot create hosts under his D-namenow we know who is hacking the site...Don't post messages for banned individuals. Don't hack into any part of the site.
My maps: http://forums.wz2100.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=9501