Warzone 2100 Forums

Hello !

I propose you my second map, a 6 players map.

Imagine a river delta bombed with atomic bombs, and occupied by strategic spot surrounded by trenches..
I suggest you to play against 5 allied AI to understand why I call this "trench war"

You begin with 8 oil points, there are 4 areas of 1 oil point, 2 areas of 2 oil point and 1 area of 4 oil points.

The map is structured with trenches, no like the WW1, I try this but it's not good for AI..

It's a CC0 licence,
I let you see this :

Edit : you will find in the following of topic a "before Bombing" version of this map



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Thanks for the new map. Nice. I like big maps. How about more scavs, next time? I`m going to try this map now. Cross your fingers

Add some detail like features and scav bases keep up the good work

Berg wrote:Add some detail like features and scav bases keep up the good work

+1

So, if you want

I give you an other version of this map :

The same map, TrenchWar Map, but just before the atomic bombing ! With scavs, and grass, trees and water, a natural wonder : It's the TrenchWarBB map, BB like "Before Bombing"



Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

I like this idea: Before atomic war, and after. 2 different map in one.
beautiful map!

Thank you

I think I will continue to make 2 maps each time, bombed and not bombed because it's simple to do

I suggest you to play this maps against 5 allied AI

Sadjuuk these play great!
upload them to http://addons.wz2100.net

I like the Trentch War map very much too. Especially the layout of terrain.

I agree with Berg that you should add more details. The very important thing is that a lot does not mean good too.

I look forward with interest for more creations of yours.

Regards,

Mero, RekamPam

I've played the first map is very good, didactic map

I especially like the second one, the BB map. But you should make the terrain higher, it all looks to flat.

Yes I must to use more 255 height for maps, no problem

I hope you nevertheless had a good skirmish

Yes, the maximum height difference is needlessly small, maybe it would be possoble to include a height scale parameter in the next map format (default would be 1 so that all the old maps would stay unchanged) or maybe one could use .exr as the heightmap format, since it can use 16 bit float. Pretty nice map still.

greate work.