Command center

The place to discuss balance changes for future versions of the game.
(Master releases & 3.X)

Do you like the change implemented in ticket #3055?

Yeah
3
12%
Nay
22
88%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Command center

Post by NoQ »

I think the change mentioned in #3055 (removing the necessity of command center to design units, research towers and have a minimap, while improving its role as a long-range sensor tower) affects the early-game balance pretty heavily, which is something i don't really like. Even though it seems to sound like removing an unnecessary macro, it also reduces the possible number of strategies, allows extremely early rushes (as compared to technology-oriented build orders that prefer a second lab to an extremely early command center) and, most importantly, even more early truck rushes.
Reg312
Regular
Regular
Posts: 681
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 18:36

Re: Command center

Post by Reg312 »

Agreed with NoQ.
Command center extends strategies, and is nice.
Jorzi
Regular
Regular
Posts: 2063
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 00:14

Re: Command center

Post by Jorzi »

Yeah, truck rush should not be encouraged
ImageImage
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
Per
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Posts: 3780
Joined: 03 Aug 2006, 19:39

Re: Command center

Post by Per »

The early game is a mess, and the HQ hacks do not really make it a whole lot better. Instead, it makes it harder to experiment with real changes.

As for truck rush, I measured it. The earliest truck rush you can do (on smaller maps) after this change is approx 1 minute 50 seconds. Before this change, it was approx 2 minutes 2 seconds. On larger maps, the difference is slightly larger, since you cannot multitask research while driving for as long, but it only differs by some seconds.

You can build tons of mg towers before you need to build anything else (reslab + hq before, only reslab now). (I can easily take out three Nexus AIs without building anything other than trucks and mg towers the whole game. I just plant an mg tower in each base entrace, within reach of one or two buildings. Then work my way in. The AI is practically dead before I make a factory. I think most noobs would be equally helpless.)

Mg towers are too cheap. They are too early. They are too poweful (whose idea was it to give them a heavy mg before it was even researched?). They are begging to be abused.
User avatar
Black Project
Regular
Regular
Posts: 745
Joined: 04 Apr 2008, 20:53

Re: Command center

Post by Black Project »

Per wrote:Mg towers are too cheap. They are too early. They are too poweful (whose idea was it to give them a heavy mg before it was even researched?). They are begging to be abused.
What about removing it from the research tree?

Don't forget that the MG Bunker is also another HMG defense who doesn't require the HMG itself to be made researchable. Make it require the HMG to be researchable also.
User avatar
Axel
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 27
Joined: 19 May 2008, 15:18
Location: Russia
Contact:

Re: Command center

Post by Axel »

Now i agree with Noq.
I like his idea of decision of this problem.
I play also under names: Zames, Cruel, Trauma
User avatar
lav_coyote25
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3434
Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 23:18

Re: Command center

Post by lav_coyote25 »

there ya go, changing the basic gpm again! :annoyed: if it aint broke. leave it the heck alone.
User avatar
vexed
Inactive
Inactive
Posts: 2538
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:07

Re: Command center

Post by vexed »

I was thinking about the same, seems to me that the template loading/saving stuff should only be enabled once you have a CC.
/facepalm ...Grinch stole Warzone🙈🙉🙊 contra principia negantem non est disputandum
Super busy, don't expect a timely reply back.
User avatar
lav_coyote25
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3434
Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 23:18

Re: Command center

Post by lav_coyote25 »

ya know, tweaking here and there is fine. but leave the basic underlying gpm the heck alone. as i have said before and will till the day i die, if it aint broke. leave it the heck alone. :annoyed:
User avatar
lav_coyote25
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3434
Joined: 08 Aug 2006, 23:18

Re: Command center

Post by lav_coyote25 »

lav_coyote25 wrote:ya know, tweaking here and there is fine. but leave the basic underlying gpm the heck alone. as i have said before and will till the day i die, if it aint broke. leave it the heck alone. :annoyed:
unless of course balance of certain weapons for all forms : skirmish / multiplayer and campaign are on the table. other wise. this will remain as is. thanks.
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Command center

Post by aubergine »

I voted "Nay".

I like the CC the way it is - I think not having a CC should prevent certain stuff from happening, forcing the CC to be built to get better stuff.
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
User avatar
effigy
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1217
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 03:21
Contact:

Re: Command center

Post by effigy »

vexed wrote:I was thinking about the same, seems to me that the template loading/saving stuff should only be enabled once you have a CC.
This makes the most sense to me. There are ways to make the CC more useful while keeping some tradition.
This is why some features aren't implemented: http://forums.wz2100.net/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=7490&view=unread#p87241
User avatar
aubergine
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3459
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 00:58
Contact:

Re: Command center

Post by aubergine »

One more idea: If you've previously spotted buildings in fog of war area, they are still visible on the map/minimap. Why not link that to the presence of a CC?

So, if you don't have a C, the map doesn't remember where buildings in FOW are. If you do have a CC, it remembers. But if your CC then gets destroyed, it forgets the locations of enemy buildings in FOW.

This would give a tactical advantage to having a CC (ability to still know where previously sighted enemy buildings are despite them currently being in FOW) and a good reason to target enemy CCs... ?
"Dedicated to discovering Warzone artefacts, and sharing them freely for the benefit of the community."
-- https://warzone.atlassian.net/wiki/display/GO
User avatar
Emdek
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1329
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 13:14
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Command center

Post by Emdek »

effigy wrote:There are ways to make the CC more useful while keeping some tradition.
What about this way?
Nadszedł już czas, najwyższy czas, nienawiść zniszczyć w sobie.
The time has come, the high time, to destroy hatred in oneself.


Beware! Mad Qt Evangelist.
User avatar
Terminator
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1077
Joined: 05 Aug 2006, 13:46
Location: Ukraine
Contact:

Re: Command center

Post by Terminator »

Emdek wrote:
effigy wrote:There are ways to make the CC more useful while keeping some tradition.
What about this way?
command relay is about nothing in current state, so... CC + nothing = CC - where is the difference ? its pointless. better to keep relay center for future (max units limit ? :roll: )
Death is the only way out... sh*t Happens !

Russian-speaking Social network Group http://vk.com/warzone2100
Post Reply