Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

The place to discuss balance changes for future versions of the game.
(Master releases & 3.X)
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by NoQ »

In what line you have this issue?
The whole "NOT BURNING" column. I think there's something wrong with damage modifier it takes.
I think 18/14 is better, i can suggest to reduce constant BURN_DAMAGE.
If we set BURN_DAMAGE to 0 and keep the rest as already done in my patch (24/22), would it be enough?
crab_
Trained
Trained
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jul 2013, 18:09

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by crab_ »

NoQ wrote:The whole "NOT BURNING" column. I think there's something wrong with damage modifier it takes.
I dont have this issue.
NoQ wrote:If we set BURN_DAMAGE to 0 and keep the rest as already done in my patch (24/22), would it be enough?
Not sure.
But it will be great step if BURN_DAMAGE will be killed.
I had suggested this long time ago, but my suggestion were not heared unfortunately :hmm:

Well i think it is enough if set burn_damage to zero, and incendiary damage from 28 to 24.
I want test it
Warzone2100 Guide - http://betaguide.wz2100.net/
crab_
Trained
Trained
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jul 2013, 18:09

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by crab_ »

I would suggest do not afraid of my patch with long list of changes :)
Warzone2100 Guide - http://betaguide.wz2100.net/
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by NoQ »

crab_ wrote:
NoQ wrote:The whole "NOT BURNING" column. I think there's something wrong with damage modifier it takes.
I dont have this issue.
2013-11-02-212333_3200x1080_scrot.png
crab_
Trained
Trained
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jul 2013, 18:09

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by crab_ »

NoQ wrote:
crab_ wrote:
NoQ wrote:The whole "NOT BURNING" column. I think there's something wrong with damage modifier it takes.
I dont have this issue.
2013-11-02-212333_3200x1080_scrot.png
What wrong on this picture?
Damage modifier - propulsion damage modifier.
Warzone2100 Guide - http://betaguide.wz2100.net/
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by NoQ »

Why is damage modifier different for old and new weapons? Why is not-burning DPS different for old and new weapons?
crab_
Trained
Trained
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jul 2013, 18:09

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by crab_ »

NoQ wrote:Why is damage modifier different for old and new weapons? Why is not-burning DPS different for old and new weapons?
Because in your patch you changed damage modifier for flamers from 100% to 80% for half-tracks :lecture:
NoQ wrote: [*]Modifiers:
  • vs. Halftracks: 100->80.
  • vs. Tracks: 90->70.
Warzone2100 Guide - http://betaguide.wz2100.net/
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by NoQ »

Oh wow. Seriously :doh:
Maybe leave this out then? :stressed:
crab_
Trained
Trained
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jul 2013, 18:09

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by crab_ »

NoQ wrote:Oh wow. Seriously :doh:
Maybe leave this out then? :stressed:
Agreed.

Try to play more with DPS calculations.
Here is list of research times
ResTime for NoQ.xlsx
(55.42 KiB) Downloaded 191 times
You can see, for example, what damage upgrades and what thermal armor upgrade is ready at time 20:00 and next calculate DPS of inferno to python and you can see impact of your changes.
In excel you have to copy whole line (to be sure formulas not damaged) and then change values of armor, armor upgrades etc.
Warzone2100 Guide - http://betaguide.wz2100.net/
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by NoQ »

Changelog changelog:
  • Further decrease MG health and damage modifiers, make down ROF upgrades smoother.
  • Further decrease flamer damage, remove unconditional burn damage, but no longer touch modifiers.
Complete changelog:
Spoiler:
Last edited by NoQ on 02 Nov 2013, 20:06, edited 1 time in total.
crab_
Trained
Trained
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jul 2013, 18:09

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by crab_ »

NoQ wrote: [*]Nerf machineguns. Reduce role of machineguns as meat shields.
Actually machineguns are not meat shileds but they are good damage dealers.
They strong, they 'all-rounder', they cheap :)
Warzone2100 Guide - http://betaguide.wz2100.net/
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by NoQ »

they cheap
This. They have huge HP/$.
But we can't make them expensive, it wouldn't make sense.

Also, do you have any statistics on how often they start piercing the armor (over 33% minimum)?
How much would the new 50/40 modifiers affect it?
crab_
Trained
Trained
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jul 2013, 18:09

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by crab_ »

NoQ wrote:
they cheap
This. They have huge HP/$.
But we can't make them expensive, it wouldn't make sense.

Also, do you have any statistics on how often they start piercing the armor (over 33% minimum)?
How much would the new 50/40 modifiers affect it?
33% minimum is minimum of damage*modifier.
When you nerf modifier you also nerf minimum damage.

As far i remember machineguns are always dealing minumum damage, except early game.

I think changing modifier from 50 to 40 should instantly reduce damage by 20% in any case.
Warzone2100 Guide - http://betaguide.wz2100.net/
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by NoQ »

33% minimum is minimum of damage*modifier.
When you nerf modifier you also nerf minimum damage.
Yeah, but armor remains the same. So it gets pierced less often.

Ok let's calculate.

HMG: 17 base damage, AG: 19 base damage, TAG: 28 base damage o_O.
Twice as much with 4 damage upgrades. Half as much with 50% modifier. So we can assume base damage is roughly what we have against slow tanks in mg-focused mid-game. Viper and Bug have 10 and 8 base armor respectively, against all other tanks we have HMG firing at 33%. Scorpion has 12 armor, which makes AG fire at 33% against all slow medium body tank. TAG is quite piercy though, but still against an unupgraded panther (something we never see) it shoots at 10/28 damage, which is only slightly above 33%.

So, yeah, right.
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Balance 3.1. Is possibly to fix before 3.2?

Post by NoQ »

Also, my HP changes are significant only in early game. In T2 they're around 10%.
Post Reply