New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Improving the artwork in Warzone2100 - not for mod discussions
User avatar
n2large0shirt
Trained
Trained
Posts: 53
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 07:08
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by n2large0shirt »

They do look like moths :lol2: I will give it another try...
Image
~Elderly before my time.~
User avatar
n2large0shirt
Trained
Trained
Posts: 53
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 07:08
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by n2large0shirt »

A little less moth like?
Retribution.png
Retribution.png (503 Bytes) Viewed 8085 times
Based on this body...
Retribution_SC.png
Retribution_SC.png (105.58 KiB) Viewed 8085 times
I don't really like the way this one turned out either. I'm not really very good at art, of any sort it turns out. :|

Still trying to figure out blender too... I think maybe I could recreate things with blocks, if it were just that easy. :?
Image
~Elderly before my time.~
Ridho_Akbar
Greenhorn
Posts: 10
Joined: 07 Sep 2010, 16:03

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Ridho_Akbar »

i VERY like if developer create new icons and User interface

View the New game menu UI concept in Artwork
User avatar
CinC
Trained
Trained
Posts: 32
Joined: 27 Nov 2009, 18:31

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by CinC »

Buginator wrote:Nice job guys! :3
CinC, the first icon's color doesn't match Wz's color scheme, any reason for it ?
Yeah i took the file direct from the WZ directory. And I forgot that black mostly is invisible :oops:
Square wrote:I like it, though it doesnt look that much like a VTOL ;)
But since many non-english (and maybe even english) speaking players, don't even know what VTOLS are ("that's a plane, ain't it?") it doesnt matter...

So... I like it! :)
I know thats it looks like a plane, that was the intention behind. (Because many VTOLs are planes, but they don't need a runway e.g. Harrier, or the F22 Raptor. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VTOL))

But i restyled my model a little, hope it looks now more like a VTOL...
VTOL.png
VTOL.png (3.53 KiB) Viewed 8074 times
VTOL on
no VTOL.png
no VTOL.png (3.7 KiB) Viewed 8074 times
VTOL off
Buginator wrote:Also, how do you guys want to be credited when we use these icons ?
Do what ever you think is right.
User avatar
macuser
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1052
Joined: 19 Mar 2010, 23:35
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by macuser »

It looks good either way. :)
ArtRev Website

ImageImage

System: AMD Phenom II x4, 4GB RAM, 640GB HD, Nvidia GeForce GT 240 1GB, Mac OS X 10.6
Jorzi
Regular
Regular
Posts: 2063
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 00:14

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Jorzi »

I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.
ImageImage
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA
Contact:

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Zarel »

Jorzi wrote:I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.
I can't find a "no license" policy on Uncyclopedia - most of it's CC-BY-NC. Can you just use CC-0?
Hiram
Greenhorn
Posts: 8
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 16:33

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Hiram »

Zarel wrote:
Jorzi wrote:I release my "kick" icon under uncyclopedia's "no license"-policy, which essentially means that you can re-license it, claim it as yours, make millions on it or use it for evil stuff and I don't care.
I can't find a "no license" policy on Uncyclopedia - most of it's CC-BY-NC. Can you just use CC-0?
Is that no-licence thingy not just the same as public domain?
KukY
Regular
Regular
Posts: 1859
Joined: 20 Mar 2009, 21:56

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by KukY »

Hiram wrote:Is that no-licence thingy not just the same as public domain?
Well, it matches the description he gave us the best.
Jorzi
Regular
Regular
Posts: 2063
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 00:14

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Jorzi »

ImageImage
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
User avatar
Zarel
Elite
Elite
Posts: 5770
Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 23:35
Location: Minnesota, USA
Contact:

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Zarel »

Jorzi wrote:http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Template:NoLicense
The funniest license yet ;)
It fails to take into account that any Berne Convention signatory state (i.e. pretty much every country, including the US) has automatic copyright, and so "no license" means "no one is allowed to use this".

Funny, but clearly not written by someone who understands copyright law, and so insufficient as a license. :| Again, if you're looking for a "do anything you want" license, I recommend CC-0.
Jorzi
Regular
Regular
Posts: 2063
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 00:14

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Jorzi »

yeah, whatever :P cc-0 it is, then
ImageImage
-insert deep philosophical statement here-
User avatar
Mysteryem
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 728
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 19:44
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Mysteryem »

Jorzi wrote:yeah, whatever :P cc-0 it is, then
Zarel loves his CC-0 doesn't he :P
"...If pure awesomeness were bricks, this would be the Great Wall of China...
The glory of this has collapsed on its self so far, that even the neutrons have collapsed."
User avatar
Rman Virgil
Professional
Professional
Posts: 3812
Joined: 25 Sep 2006, 01:06
Location: USA

Re: New icons needed for 2.3.5 (final)

Post by Rman Virgil »

.
Cool-a-mundo. :D

Frack CC-O. ;)

.
.

Impact = C x (R + E + A + T + E)

Contrast
Reach
Exposure
Articulation
Trust
Echo
.
Post Reply