Page 11 of 13
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 31 Oct 2010, 00:41
by Colditz
New graphic technologies are the only thing that would be a reason to start work again, anything else is senseless in my eyes. Besides the fact that I love Warzone 2100 since 1999, I would rather see more efforts for the techniques MaNGusT mentioned above than "new buildings", "new units" or other major changes which don't honor the original game.
Needless to say but I'm watching the board in the future.
In the meantime, I'm always busy.
http://img.xrmb2.net/images/310585.jpeg
http://img.xrmb2.net/images/970841.jpeg
http://img.xrmb2.net/images/837130.jpeg
http://img.xrmb2.net/images/108868.jpeg
http://img.xrmb2.net/images/234809.jpeg
http://bwmod.armedassault.info/images/gallery/77.jpg
http://bwmod.armedassault.info/images/gallery/79.jpg
http://bwmod.armedassault.info/images/gallery/80.jpg
http://bwmod.armedassault.info/images/gallery/81.jpg
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 31 Oct 2010, 13:35
by Wibble199
Wow, those are very very nice models there
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 11 Jun 2011, 12:09
by Colditz
Just playing around a bit.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 11 Jun 2011, 12:52
by MaNGusT
Colditz wrote:Just playing around a bit.
I don't think that "H" should be bump mapped, it should be flat.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 12 Jun 2011, 00:30
by CyclonatorZ
MaNGusT wrote: I don't think that "H" should be bump mapped, it should be flat.
I agree, but since it looks great, perhaps the detail could be baked in.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 12 Jun 2011, 10:38
by Jorzi
It's just a subtle bump, though, so it might be a realistic simulation of the layer of paint upon the concrete imo
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 13 Jun 2011, 13:37
by Colditz
I know it does not fit right now, but the building isn't finished yet.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 13 Jun 2011, 14:41
by Jorzi
Really nice
By the way, are you into object space normal maps at all or do you also require tangent space?
(not that I would stop trying to implement tangent space, we need it anyway, it's just not currently working
)
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 13 Jun 2011, 17:28
by MaNGusT
In 3ds Max object space normal maps are called Local XY.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 13 Jun 2011, 17:43
by Colditz
Object Space is called "Local XYZ" and Yes, I use them.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 13 Jun 2011, 17:56
by MaNGusT
Colditz wrote:Object Space is called "Local XYZ" and Yes, I use them.
the image you posted looks as tangent space.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 13 Jun 2011, 18:13
by Colditz
I know, but it's the output of the 3ds max.
By the way, here's my highpoly mesh.
I'm currently aiming for a 256 px texture size per square tile, means a 3x3 square base plate has 768x768 px.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 13 Jun 2011, 18:31
by MaNGusT
Colditz wrote:I know, but it's the output of the 3ds max.
strange. mine looks so
- object space
- hcannon_nor2.png (69.46 KiB) Viewed 40557 times
- tangent space
- Hcannon_NM.png (66.85 KiB) Viewed 40557 times
By the way, here's my highpoly mesh.
ah.. parallax mapping(or even displacement mapping) could improve your models so much..
btw very very good.
I'm currently aiming for a 256 px texture size per square tile, means a 3x3 square base plate has 768x768 px.
agree but I suggest you to have backup of your textures in max size(for me 2048x2048). may be in a future we will require doubled texture resolution for "ultra" quality settings.
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 02 Mar 2012, 21:16
by MaNGusT
are you still with us?
Re: Structure Improvement
Posted: 02 Mar 2012, 23:58
by Colditz
More dead than alive.
