Jorzi wrote:He actually did apply it and let us test it. That's why it's called a beta. You don't need a pre-release for a beta because it is a pre-release.

Jorzi wrote:He actually did apply it and let us test it. That's why it's called a beta. You don't need a pre-release for a beta because it is a pre-release.
nobody has said if the fix works or not. if it doesn't work then why did he put it up? why not apply it and let us test it?Berg wrote:Changes that make bugs need fixing not the code changed to suit the bugs.
at the cost of breaking the game from how it was? no.Jorzi wrote:@Zany: do you want stored templates or not?
Rman Virgil wrote:.
zany is just being 'zany' & living up to the meaning of his nick.![]()
.
if you remove a rule that is a new rule since the behavior has changedIluvalar wrote:You dont get it, they remove a rule, they don't add any other... there is no "NEW" rules.zany wrote:if that fixes it then what is the problem? making new rules because you don't like the old rules is lame
what?cybersphinx wrote:Read too much Phoronix?Per wrote:zany - what the heck is wrong with you?
Rman Virgil wrote:...........
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." ~ Lord Acton
zany wrote:Emdek wrote:The best solution would to but warning: "this is beta stuff, it can eat your cat, but we would appreciate feedback anyway".I double dare them to write that in the next beta 7 I mean beta 8!
nobody ever said why beta 3 was pulled