Jorzi wrote:He actually did apply it and let us test it. That's why it's called a beta. You don't need a pre-release for a beta because it is a pre-release.

it was just made so how did they apply it? #3344

Berg wrote:Changes that make bugs need fixing not the code changed to suit the bugs.

nobody has said if the fix works or not. if it doesn't work then why did he put it up? why not apply it and let us test it?

Jorzi wrote:@Zany: do you want stored templates or not?

at the cost of breaking the game from how it was? no.
the old moderator that was banned warned all of us about what they are doing to the game and it is all true

Iluvalar is correct. This all started as an unintended side-effect of adding stored templates. Nobody wanted to change any rules at this time. Since then we've tried very hard to keep the rules exactly as they are, but the costs of doing so have shown themselves, as the bug count from the hacks use...

Rman Virgil wrote:.
zany is just being 'zany' & living up to the meaning of his nick.
.

not in this case though

Iluvalar wrote:

zany wrote:if that fixes it then what is the problem? making new rules because you don't like the old rules is lame

You dont get it, they remove a rule, they don't add any other... there is no "NEW" rules.

if you remove a rule that is a new rule since the behavior has changed

if that fixes it then what is the problem? making new rules because you don't like the old rules is lame

cybersphinx wrote:

Per wrote:zany - what the heck is wrong with you?

Read too much Phoronix?

what?

zany - what the heck is wrong with you? Stop the fricking' complaining all the time. It is getting really annoying. Don't make duplicate posts. And it is clear from the above that you don't even understand the discussion. And I'm not a "they". you got that backwards since you are the one that keeps...

first bug report! http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/3337 dibs on beta 8! :annoyed: they don't want to fix it! This is getting out of hand. I regret caving in to the purists on this one. We're adding a ton of ugly exceptions to the code so that a few individuals should not have to learn anything ne...

those show how bad wz can get with the path finding

Rman Virgil wrote:...........
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." ~ Lord Acton

the devs don't listen and want to do away with old rules and nobody can stop them #3337

Now, before I get rubbished for not having beta 7 yet :wink: , I plan to download on the weekend. System: Windows 7 on an Intel i7-2600 @ 3.4 Ghz w/ 8 GB DDR3 RAM & w/ Nvidia GeForce GT520, no Internet or Network Program: Warzone 2100 3.1 B4, VSync on, texture size 1024, resolution 1920x1080, fulls...

3337 This is getting out of hand. I regret caving in to the purists on this one. We're adding a ton of ugly exceptions to the code so that a few individuals should not have to learn anything new. :x it was good for the game for over 10 years and now you think you can just make up new rules? :dash1:

zany wrote:

Emdek wrote:The best solution would to but warning: "this is beta stuff, it can eat your cat, but we would appreciate feedback anyway".

I double dare them to write that in the next beta 7 I mean beta 8!
nobody ever said why beta 3 was pulled

they didn't do it