Page 1 of 1

DL_TOUGH and DL_KILLER difficulty levels

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 12:53
by aubergine
I noticed the DL_TOUGH and DL_KILLER difficulty levels in this commit: https://github.com/Warzone2100/warzone2 ... 1933d7fbc6

Are tough and killer levels used anywhere? I imagine that they might be related to cheat codes or something else?

Re: DL_TOUGH and DL_KILLER difficulty levels

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 14:04
by Per
"biffer baker" => DL_KILLER
"double up" => DL_TOUGH

PS With the amount of questions you have, you should be on IRC... :)

Re: DL_TOUGH and DL_KILLER difficulty levels

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 16:04
by aubergine
I would go on IRC but I fear that realtime communications would thwart my attempt to demyeliante my brain's language-based pathways. Even a short telephone conversation can set me back several weeks. Specifically, for the past 7 years I've been conducting an experiment on myself to try and stop thinking in any form of human language or symbology. I still do a lot of my thinking in English, and it's difficult to avoid the glyphs we call letters and numbers, but with each passing year I'm freeing my brain from its ancestry. I spend 8 hours a day forcing myself to think in terms of colours, sounds, smells, naturally occurring shapes, etc. I find realtime communication not only difficult but also it causes me to relapse in to increased amounts of human language-based thinking.

Re: DL_TOUGH and DL_KILLER difficulty levels

Posted: 07 Jan 2013, 18:41
by milo christiansen
I hate to tell you this but asking questions in written english (even if not real-time) has already thwarted your plan :lol2:

Re: DL_TOUGH and DL_KILLER difficulty levels

Posted: 07 Jan 2013, 19:23
by aubergine
Not really. I can take as long as I like here in the forum to write something.

Also, recently I'm finding a lot of success with associating words with pictures, rather than the other way round. It's just really time consuming to create a pictoral lexicon. I can certainly appreciate now why we humans so readily latch on to existing, ready-made languages despite the inevitable outcome.