Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Discuss the future of Warzone 2100 with us.
Post Reply
Bethrezen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 661
Joined: 25 Sep 2009, 02:05

Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Post by Bethrezen »

ok so just went to https://github.com/Warzone2100/warzone2 ... ent-builds because I wanted to see if the latest build was working for XP yet

so i scrolled down and clicked the Windows (x86) Portable button but I when decompressed the files the warzone2100_portable.exe was missing as you can see in this screen shot.

untitled.PNG
untitled.PNG (17.74 KiB) Viewed 5396 times

so i tried the installer version instead but that's not working right either and got the following error message.

untitled2.PNG
untitled2.PNG (20.97 KiB) Viewed 5396 times

and the games main executable was missing as you can see in this screen shot

untitled3.PNG
untitled3.PNG (21.51 KiB) Viewed 5396 times

so I'm not sure what is going on but it seems that both the installers for both the development builds are broken so someone might wanna look into this.

also seems that the forum software is slightly broken when it comes to adding attachments as well because the attachments keep vanishing when you click the attachments tab plus its incorrectly displaying the attachments at the bottom of the post when i have already placed them inline so they shouldn't be displaying a second time so someone might wanna fix that to.
Attachments
untitled3.PNG
untitled3.PNG (21.51 KiB) Viewed 5397 times
untitled2.PNG
untitled2.PNG (20.97 KiB) Viewed 5397 times
untitled.PNG
untitled.PNG (17.74 KiB) Viewed 5397 times
untitled2.PNG
untitled2.PNG (20.97 KiB) Viewed 5398 times
pastdue
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Posts: 339
Joined: 13 Aug 2017, 17:44

Re: Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Post by pastdue »

Both installers now install a warzone2100.exe in the bin folder.

If using the portable version, you'll want to open the bin folder and double-click on the warzone2100 executable to start. (We'll add a text file in the root folder with these instructions.)

If using the full installer, there should be a Start Menu shortcut to launch it.

----

As for the installer download error you are encountering: that's because you're using Windows XP, which doesn't support connecting to the HTTPS download server.

You can manually download and install the latest Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2017 from here: https://aka.ms/vs/15/release/vc_redist.x86.exe

----

Finally, the latest development builds do not support Windows XP. The vcpkg pull request that's needed to enable Windows XP-compatible builds unfortunately appears to be languishing - it hasn't had any updates in a while, and requires substantial work still. Until / unless that's resolved, we can't make XP-compatible builds.

RE: Forum issues - what web browser (and version) are you running? I'm pretty sure the major web browsers dropped Windows XP support a while ago, so it wouldn't surprise me that an older browser version is hitting layout / display issues with the updated forum software.

Not to sound like a broken record, but Windows XP isn't safe to run - period. You'd be better off running a Linux variant and WINE (to run older Windows software - it's continued to improve dramatically, and is very likely to run Windows XP-era software). Ubuntu (or similar) will probably run on your machine.
Bethrezen
Regular
Regular
Posts: 661
Joined: 25 Sep 2009, 02:05

Re: Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Post by Bethrezen »

Both installers now install a warzone2100.exe in the bin folder.

If using the portable version, you'll want to open the bin folder and double-click on the warzone2100 executable to start. (We'll add a text file in the root folder with these instructions.)

If using the full installer, there should be a Start Menu shortcut to launch it.
that's a bit counter intuitive isn't it ? for every other portable app I've ever used the executable is in the main directory and then the rest of the program files is in the bin folder

As for the installer download error you are encountering: that's because you're using Windows XP, which doesn't support connecting to the HTTPS download server.

You can manually download and install the latest Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2017 from here: https://aka.ms/vs/15/release/vc_redist.x86.exe

Finally, the latest development builds do not support Windows XP. The vcpkg pull request that's needed to enable Windows XP-compatible builds unfortunately appears to be languishing - it hasn't had any updates in a while, and requires substantial work still. Until / unless that's resolved, we can't make XP-compatible builds.
I see i had hoped the vcpkg thing had been sorted out by now oh well guess not, in that case i guess there isn't much point in downloading and installing the Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2017 as things still wouldn't work anyway pity.

RE: Forum issues - what web browser (and version) are you running? I'm pretty sure the major web browsers dropped Windows XP support a while ago, so it wouldn't surprise me that an older browser version is hitting layout / display issues with the updated forum software.
Firefox 52.9.0 that last version that had XP support as far as I'm aware.

Not to sound like a broken record, but Windows XP isn't safe to run - period. You'd be better off running a Linux variant and WINE (to run older Windows software - it's continued to improve dramatically, and is very likely to run Windows XP-era software). Ubuntu (or similar) will probably run on your machine.

i already tried various Linux distro's and i didn't like any of them.

As for windows 10 i tried that to and went back to XP because Windows 10 sucks balls and i can't stand it, to may things about windows 10 that irritate the crap out of like for example no ability to turn auto update to inform me when updates are available but let me decide when to install, which is annoying as hell especially when you are trying to get shut down or booted up and suddenly windows decides it want to install a bunch of updates.

Windows 10 takes forever to boot up as well my xp machine will go from a cold start to being fully ready to use in 30 seconds but it can take upwards of 2 minutes just for windows 10 to load the user profile and that's not to mention loading all your applications like the virus scanner fire wall etc.

then you have the horrendous amounts of extraneous garbage that i don't want don't need and cant get rid of which make the OS run with all the speed of a glacier my xp machine runs circles around windows 10 and is faster and more responsive in every way possible all be it a little less advanced but of course since i mostly just used this computer for playing games i don't really need any of there so called "advancements" this computer does everything i need it to do, it does it in a timely manor, it doesn't usurp and override my control, and it doesn't spy on me.

What can i say i take a very dim view of programmes that try to phone home without my permission i don't care what data Microsoft is trying to collect or for what reason phoning home without my permission is forbidden and any programme that does so is swiftly removed from my computer.

Ultimately that stuff is just the tip of the iceburg i have a much longer and more extensive list of complaints, about windows 10, I'd love to have a more modern system trouble is there isn't one that i can afford, actually use and like, i have been watching React OS for a little while now but its still in alpha and not ready for general use yet.

i though about trying to get a copy of Windows 7 but there is little point since that is about to be discontinued as well and as for Windows 8 well that is a pile of garbage that is intended for mobile computers with touch screens not desktop computers

Windows 7, service pack 1
End of mainstream support - January 13, 2015
End of extended support - January 14, 2020

Windows 8.1
End of mainstream support - January 9, 2018
End of extended support - January 10, 2023

While I know its not generally a good idea to use an outdated systems I'm not a total idiot i have my files backed up on a second hard drive so even if i get a virus or windows gets corrupted I just reformat and reinstall from my clean true image back up which is also stored on the other hard drive, plus i have a third party virus scanner and firewall, and spybot and i keep there definitions updated and i scan me computer periodically, and you know in all the years i have been using computer i have rarely had a problem caused by malware, because the virus scanner and spybot catch most of it.
pastdue
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Posts: 339
Joined: 13 Aug 2017, 17:44

Re: Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Post by pastdue »

Bethrezen wrote: 11 Dec 2018, 04:26
Both installers now install a warzone2100.exe in the bin folder.

If using the portable version, you'll want to open the bin folder and double-click on the warzone2100 executable to start. (We'll add a text file in the root folder with these instructions.)

If using the full installer, there should be a Start Menu shortcut to launch it.
that's a bit counter intuitive isn't it ? for every other portable app I've ever used the executable is in the main directory and then the rest of the program files is in the bin folder
There is now a launch_warzone.bat file in the root folder (for the portable build).
User avatar
vexed
Inactive
Inactive
Posts: 2538
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:07

Re: Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Post by vexed »

This isn't the first time people were wondering what is going on... batch files are just not common.

Would be better to just replace that with a shortcut that points to the executable, there shouldn't be any issue creating it, people tell the installer where to put things, so we have the path...
/facepalm ...Grinch stole Warzone🙈🙉🙊 contra principia negantem non est disputandum
Super busy, don't expect a timely reply back.
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Post by NoQ »

I'm not a total idiot i have my files backed up on a second hard drive so even if i get a virus or windows gets corrupted I just reformat and reinstall from my clean true image back up which is also stored on the other hard drive
A regular off-topic reminder that losing data is pretty much the smallest problem viruses cause these days. I just feel that it's an important thing to repeat out loud from time to time.
Spoiler:
pastdue
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Warzone 2100 Team Member
Posts: 339
Joined: 13 Aug 2017, 17:44

Re: Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Post by pastdue »

vexed wrote: 21 Jan 2019, 01:29 This isn't the first time people were wondering what is going on... batch files are just not common.

Would be better to just replace that with a shortcut that points to the executable, there shouldn't be any issue creating it, people tell the installer where to put things, so we have the path...
The full installer is able to install shortcuts (and does). What Bethrezen encountered there was a Windows XP-related issue.

The problem is the portable installer: there are issues with trying to create shortcuts with relative paths. Since the portable installer is supposed to support being installed to a USB key / drive that is moved between machines, it needs to support relative paths. (The drive may be mounted at a different drive letter / path from one machine to another.)

A batch file can easily handle a relative path, so it should "just work" even when moving between machines, or copying the folder somewhere else.

(Note also: the batch file wasn't being installed when Bethrezen first tested the portable installer.)
User avatar
vexed
Inactive
Inactive
Posts: 2538
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 02:07

Re: Latest development builds: portable & installer versions broken

Post by vexed »

Oh, just realized we didn't do shortcuts for the portable builds, it was just the main executable, and then people could copy everything where they installed it, and that worked everywhere.

Seems the directory structure has changed (for some reason I suppose) which is why the batch file is used.

Not a deal breaker, just doing things differently than before. Guess we will see how it goes from doing the beta releases.
/facepalm ...Grinch stole Warzone🙈🙉🙊 contra principia negantem non est disputandum
Super busy, don't expect a timely reply back.
Post Reply