Comparative strength of Bunkers

Discussions about AI types, units, tactics & strategy.
Post Reply
Schwager1
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 00:30

Comparative strength of Bunkers

Post by Schwager1 »

I am trying to determine the comparative strength of Bunkers versus Guard towers & Hardpoints. I see that the MG Guard Tower has 600 HPs & the HMG Hardpoint has 950 HPs how the the MG bunker compare? :?: :?:
User avatar
NoQ
Special
Special
Posts: 6226
Joined: 24 Dec 2009, 11:35
Location: /var/zone

Re: Comparative strength of Bunkers

Post by NoQ »

The most important feature of bunkers is their modifiers. They are much less vulnerable against cannons and artillery and stuff, but much more vulnerable against flamers and bunker busters.
Lord Apocalypse
Regular
Regular
Posts: 678
Joined: 29 Jul 2009, 18:01

Re: Comparative strength of Bunkers

Post by Lord Apocalypse »

Another is size difference. At least when comparing towers to hardpoints.
anonim17465
Trained
Trained
Posts: 80
Joined: 16 Dec 2013, 08:06

Re: Comparative strength of Bunkers

Post by anonim17465 »

buckers has a great defence, but their modifiers by some reason have been nerfed, and now they are not so good against cannons...
but in general towers are for attacking enemy units and bunckers are for defending place. emplacements has about 10 defence, hard tower about 15 and bunker 20. And with concrete improovements their defence grows really fast. up to 100 at the end of the game. and it does grow accordingly to the default defence.
http://warzone2100.info/structure.php#bunkers_header (thanks to crab_)
anonim17465
Trained
Trained
Posts: 80
Joined: 16 Dec 2013, 08:06

Re: Comparative strength of Bunkers

Post by anonim17465 »

Have a look at this table, (thanks to crab_)
http://warzone2100.info/structure.php

In general bunkers have 20 defence, hard points have 15 defence and emplacements have 10 defence.
That can change situation a lot, especially after concrete upgrade, that are easy available.
Post Reply