Page 7 of 9

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 00:09
by Giani
I just had an idea about OP hover-MRA. Hovercraft could make the MRAs to miss more shots than tracks, wheels or halftracks.
(But not a big difference, something like 2-6% more missed shots)

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 05:33
by Iluvalar
I have also an idea for rockets, but it's highly controversial : Make them anti-tank.

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 06 Jun 2012, 00:36
by Giani
Sorry, I meant MRA, not all rockets.

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 06 Jun 2012, 18:30
by Iluvalar
Don't be sorry, I meant everything that is affected by http://guide.wz2100.net/r/herockets . And yes, that include MRA.

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 07 Jun 2012, 18:31
by tmp500
how many miles does a beta have to walk to get decent balanced flamers, mgs and canons? don't tell me now that those shoes weren't meant to be walked ^ i tried noqs balanced shoes for quite some miles now and gosh they made a difference! from time to time i look down at my old shoes and think that i cant handle them anymore, the threads are walked loose, the right one has a big hole in it and they really don't smell any good anymore. i was hoping for a copy of noqs very well balanced shoes, but he said that they arent compatible with the rest of the folks.... so i heard a rumor that a bunch of people are camping infront the balanced entry, waiting anxiously that their new pair of shoes get a well deserved balance upgrade.... i really hope that the 1% lend an ear to the 99%..... i really do....

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 07 Jun 2012, 20:21
by The Overlord
I WANT THOSE SHOES TOO!!!!!!! (+1)

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 07 Jun 2012, 20:23
by Alfacinha[BDC]
I also want them. At least with this balance (NoQ) i don't get "bored" to use always the same weapon setup.

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 07 Jun 2012, 20:29
by JDW
.

+1

I agree. The changes as per NoQ's balance mod would be a welcome first step towards a better balance in 3.1. We miss those cannons.
.

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 08 Jun 2012, 00:01
by Giani
+1 :)

"Your message contains 5 characters. The minimum number of characters you need to enter is 6." :stressed:

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 08 Jun 2012, 00:05
by Cyp
+1

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 08 Jun 2012, 00:19
by aubergine
<is wondering how cyp managed to post with only 2 chars...>

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 08 Jun 2012, 00:22
by JDW
If only we could !petavote, !gigavote , !megavote , etc... like we do to wzbot...

/me sighs

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 08 Jun 2012, 00:23
by The Overlord
Cyp: Get on it, my friend. ;)

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 08 Jun 2012, 03:03
by Iluvalar
+1    

Re: Yet another balance proposal.

Posted: 20 Jun 2012, 15:03
by Iluvalar
NoQ, I just realized that you didn't reverted your change for cannon fortress ? They are now weaker than ever in low oil :( .