Updated EditWorld 32 for 2.x (2.1.x, 2.2.x ...)

[KukY]

I currently do use flame, but I wanted to also give this a try.

Your wish will burry you alive.
It's old, buggy, doesn't support current WZ format, is very hard to use, pain to install and start it running...
Should I continue?

[Killar]

Please do, as I am not totally convinced. LOL

[lav_coyote25]

I currently do use flame, but I wanted to also give this a try.

Your wish will burry you alive.
It's old, buggy, doesn't support current WZ format, is very hard to use, pain to install and start it running...
Should I continue?

explain to me what isnt compatible...ie: what isnt supported? ya know i really get perturbed when people start going on about sh..tuff they have no inkling on what they say.

editworld has worked for me and continues to work for me . anyone wishing to experiment with it is more than welcome to ask me questions, but not here as it seems that editworld 32bit is ( start sarcasm : tooooo buggy. / end sarcasm)

kgmetcalfe@hotmail.com will get you to my email and as well the ms messenger live. if you dont use either just email me what you do use and will go from there. and to kuky... no offence taken or given.

[Buginator]

NOTE, Editworld 32 does NOT support 3/5/6/7 player maps! For that, you *must* use FlaME 1.10+ or manually fix editworld. We do NOT have the source code to fix this.

[Xhadow]

NOTE, Editworld 32 does NOT support 3/5/6/7 player maps! For that, you *must* use FlaME 1.10+ or manually fix editworld. We do NOT have the source code to fix this.

Well now see that's just unfortunate.

[lav_coyote25]

yeah - unfortunate! locking this as it is no longer relevant except for the history.