tmp500 wrote:10 player this time, and it looks this one is easy to fill up with random players
scavangers, full bases etc...
Shadow Wolf TJC wrote:Between you, Duda, and others, we're starting to see more of those 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 player maps
JDW wrote:That's team BDC for you. Some of them got together and decided to make maps to fill these nearly empty categories for 3.1 . Alphacinha is also involved. And soon we may even see some maps from Overlord.
*too much hills - MRA weapon become OP. because it shoot good from/to hills
*too much oils
*too much scavs
*too much features - this works bad because units stuck often in 3.1 beta
Cool, when will we see 100 player maps?
aubergine wrote:Anything with 21 players or more would be an issue because artefacts and oil barrels are hard-coded in Warzone to player ID 21. Changing that would likely require lots of updates to maps, campaigns, mods, etc. Also, features are hard-coded to player 99 so similar issues there.
Mysteryem wrote:Well, the current maximum is 10 players (10 ai/player and 1 scavenger), though if you modify the map's files manually, you can make it so that the scavengers are a human controlled player, and can make it an 11 player map. But, you begin running into problems with the UI, since there's no 11 player maps page, and the list of players/ai becomes rather squished into the UI. I'll tell you now that the game will just crash at 12 or more players currently. And you get the option to play as the white team when there are 11 players.
sg1efc wrote:Cool, when will we see 100 player maps?
tmp500 wrote:not from me
Well, scavengers used to be hardcoded to player ID 7 ...Anything with 21 players or more would be an issue because artefacts and oil barrels are hard-coded in Warzone to player ID 21
i guess that's the benefit of being the map maker, you can make them to your liking
Merowingg wrote:And speaking of BDC I wonder what you will do when all players will be in BDC
Merowingg wrote:If I am to see beyond.. I will say that the left right, and then top bottom rotation is a little too clearly visible here.. the area where top and bottom serves well its lets say valley path purpose, but I think adding at least two hills, or some hills with no cliff tiles, not so high I mean, would erase this clearly lookink joint place, whis seems unnatural for me at least
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest