effigy wrote:come again?
effigy wrote:Plain English with complete thought.
j0shdrunk0nwar wrote:effigy, That should have been done as homework. And you cheated.
Frankly, I more often than not don't get what RV says, but I do look up the words to interpret his cryptic communication better.
.... there is method to my "madness". 
Nor is it necessary. I assume that came across as trollish, but that wasn't my intent.Rman Virgil wrote:.
I see 2 fine posts submitted while writing my response. I'll let my response stand though I'm tempted to speak to the "plain English with complete thought" reference - but won't.
I think the point of your original post made it through and that's what counts. I'll contain the urge to pick it apart furtherRman Virgil wrote:.
...
Hmmm. admittedly I'm doing a lot of thought compression in that single sentence that could, & has, filled volumes. Let me think of a particular cogent example that would illustrate concretely over the general terms I used ........
Ahhh.... wait.... I just thought of 2 rather settled historical examples that may serve us here; the trial of Socrates in its full context and Galileo's defense of Copernicus in 1616 before the Catholic Church in Rome and subsequent events.
lol, I did need to look up a few words...it's more the lack of punctuation, and perhaps some of the grammar that made this a difficult read.j0shdrunk0nwar wrote:effigy wrote:come again?effigy, That should have been done as homework. And you cheated.effigy wrote:Plain English with complete thought.
Frankly, I more often than not don't get what RV says, but I do look up the words to interpret his cryptic communication better.
Really. Hahaha. Would green be your favorite color ?effigy wrote: lol, I did need to look up a few words...it's more the lack of punctuation, and perhaps some of the grammar that made this a difficult read.
I'm sure Henry James would be an impossible read for you; Proust, a veritable nightmare. 
Is that substance sufficiently clear and comprehensible ? If not, I think I might be able to break it down to a romper room level. Or maybe not.Rman Virgil wrote:Still, KukY raises a fair number of valid points that are not at all difficult to address if there is a basic will to do so.
Perhaps a cogent discussion, in a dedicated thread, towards articulating a set of objective, transparent, map excellence baseline criteria or metrics would be a useful enterprise for all with vested interests in the continued robust evolution of WZ in all its many facets as a game and the active community engaged inclusive.
It certainly couldn't hurt, I would think. And bandwidth would be as much a non-factor as distro inclusion (at least at this stage).
Rman Virgil wrote:.
Really. Hahaha. Would green be your favorite color ?
contra principia negantem non est disputandumThere is no Cockpit map included in this release.cybersphinx wrote:A lot of maps don't have bases, and imo that's a prerequisite for including new maps (though the included Cockate and Cockpit don't have them...).KukY wrote:I am also suprised that it is in-game... There are lots of maps that are better than it, and aren't included with the game...
There is, but Cockate is used instead of Cockpit because of bugs in the game.PkK wrote:There is no Cockpit map included in this release.
When does it crash for you? SKr, MP or CAM?Bruno Rodolfo wrote:this version is very good, but it crashes every time .........
all these...j0shdrunk0nwar wrote:When does it crash for you? SKr, MP or CAM?Bruno Rodolfo wrote:this version is very good, but it crashes every time .........
Dude, i think you should report in help/troubleshooting so that the professionals can diagnose your problem.Bruno Rodolfo wrote:all these...
yeah, but i felt like he needs help on how to report the bug, considering he complained hereZarel wrote:A crash report would be really nice, for the record.
