Warzone 2100 Forums

It is incredibly sad what is going on here at the forums. :cry: No, not about the users who blatantly violate forums rules, all forums have these morons and they are dealt with. I am talking about persons with the power to stop such things from going on in the first place only to bitch-slap their ve...

I fear that someone's going to be banned or suspended soon... Anyways, if anyone doesn't like how the site is being run, then you may want to go find some other site to go to (or create one yourself). (You're welcome to move to the new Wikizone 2100 wiki, or to Aubergine's Warzone 2100 website.) I'...

They already have been doing that for the super transport

Yes, read it, I just don't understand how do we know which map is which now, everything about them is the same except the filename. 2c-UrbanMystery.wz 2c-UrbanMystery-3387e94c92381167f56f0bfb60e4cd5ad24597e94392a5135e980ae19e4d4bbc.wz 2c-UrbanMystery-2e99758548972a8e8822ad47fa1017ff72f06f3ff6a016851...

You can rename the file to anything now and it still shows the same map name and map preview.

There was some kind of change that makes all the maps have a incredibly long filename with a bunch of numbers instead of how it was before.
When you go to pick a map it has a bunch of duplicate names in the map list and the map preview shows the same image for each of them.
Is this a bug?

Maybe they need to add a info button to the main menu so they can set the record straight?
Those scumbags can't edit the game and sell it, right?

Does anyone know how to create the guide data that is located here http://guide.wz2100.net/? It is out of date and I was looking into updating it and then post changes on the wiki.

cybersphinx wrote:

Paul wrote:This is why the GPL is flawed.

I'd say the GPL is fine, people who don't google what they spend money for are flawed.

Is this the stupidity clause?
I still don' think it should be allowed, and they should require full disclosure.

There is something wrong when other people get financial gain for other people's work.

I am just worried about how much texture memory this will use? My low end laptop can still play Warzone but it has a limit of 128megs vram.
Does the game load everything even if you don't use all the texture sets?

I thought they could sell GPL licensed products as long as they follow all the guidelines?
There is also the portable version of warzone that they ask for donations and none of the profits are sent to the developers here.
This is why the GPL is flawed.

Giani wrote:Ships are planned for 3.2+

Where have you read that?

You are making it so we can load a unlimited number of textures now?

I was just about to comment about this as well.
His topic was locked so there must have been something that went on?
Staff, can you tell us more?