Warzone 2100 Forums

The problem I have with naval units is making them cost effective that people will want to use them outside "hey man lol let's have a naval battle". Only way I see to do that is give naval units unique weapons only they can use, which will seem contrived since as far as I know they all use...

I've thought of this before but never got around to posting it; I entirely agree this is a good idea.

Using a howitzer without a sensor and with an attack group is p. much an assault gun.

I had thought about this sorta, like, more specifically a tank destroyer, has all-rounder grade armor and as more damage than a comparable lancer, but a fixed casemate and not a turret.

My Warzone 2100 game won't display maps I install that aren't 2/4/8 players. Even in the menu that shows all maps they do not appear if they are 3,5,6,7 player.

How to fix this?

Should probably add that the map creator is Indian. The Swastika is not seen as offensive in the east.

Actually a "Super Light Body" would be in the category of a Heavy Body if it's to keep with the relative formula of the other super heavy bodies.

You know this brings a thought to my head perhaps giving the light mortar/pepperpot/incendiary mortar the ability to rotate their turrets and fire on the move.

Or maybe make that be a later upgrade? Could give them some staying power in late game.

So you're basically saying E2150 looks nicer than WZ2100? There's a lot of UI work going in to WZ v3.0 which is making it look much nicer. A lot of the graphics are still from the original release many years ago, which is why they look dated, but over time they will get better. Remember that WZ is ...

I've actually been playing The Moon Project recently.

Earth 2150 is a great game, and I don't think it's "better" or "worse" than Warzone...they're both great games.

I have to say I agree.

The way the turrets look on most fortresses is atrocious. They almost look like cartoony toys.

Mainly the Cannon and Mass Driver fortresses, though to a smaller extant the Rocket Bastion. The Missile Fortress looks okay.

KukY wrote:

Kacen wrote:We should allow needle guns to target aircraft.

All VTOL weapons, excluding bombs should be able to target air.

I mean even needle guns mounted on the ground.

I mean logic dictates that if an HVC can target air, then at the very least the needle gun should be able to; more effectively I might add.

We should allow needle guns to target aircraft.

What exactly are you guys saying here? Can we like unify the proposal? Right now, it sounds like I should get rid of the VTOL Flak Cannon, and add a VTOL Hurricane. I'm not for that ether. It's just that mounting anti-air guns on an aircraft, by that I mean the turrets, looks off. In fact mounting ...

Well there should be more ammunitions on vtols because most mgs has so little ammo.There should be an special vtol machine gun.an double 50.cal mgs like in real fighter places with rapid fire and there should be a second weapon and thats rockets! You keep asking for changes that will completely cha...

Stinger missile, Sidewinder/chaparral missile. 20mm hispano cannon M-61 vulcan cannon AIM-120 AMRAAM/SLAMRAAM M2 machine gun (although this wasn't designed as such, it was used as such on a quad mount) AA weapons that aren't mounted on aircraft, are only not mounted due to weight concerns. Flak can...